http://www.npr.org/blogs/monkeysee/2011/08/30/140056318/your-friends-are-not-your-audience-a-disturbing-internet-lesson-in-perspective?sc=fb&cc=fp
Warning- there will probably be some feminist ranting. But if you read the article and watch the video- it's pretty disgusting and degrading.
Our information age has changed our internal filters. This kid telling this story knows he's being taped and (I'm guessing) is looking for flash in the pan fame- much like someone whose blog post goes viral or youtube video goes viral. But when is it too far? I'm sure he's told the story to his friends and since they thought it was funny, he assumed this tale of sexual assault would regale the world and bring him the good feelings short lived fame brings.
Honestly- I'm disgusted by the amount of people who *continue* to laugh throughout the whole story. And I'm disgusted that these improv guys are totally prodding him to continue. Sex stories and jokes can be hilarious, don't get me wrong. But one listen and this is obviously not funny.
She said no. Multiple times. When will the tired diatribe of "She said no, but didn't mean it..." be put to rest? Granted, we don't know the entire story, but the convenience of how he leaves out details only when it comes to what happened after her repeated rebuffs and having sex is suspect.
If it turns out that this woman did in fact have sex with consent, then all the more power to the both of them. A bad mistake with a chance encounter. But even if that is how it turns out (I've got my doubts)- it's a double standard. This guy tells the story and he's regaled by the audience and the comedians for his pursuit. He's a stud, doesn't take no for an answer and takes risks. If we tell this from the woman's point of view- obviously she's a slut. She gave out her number while drunk and had sex with a man she didn't know. She's easily malleable and used, since she was so convinced by someone she never knew to have sex. No matter how you look at it- he's got the power, her the shame.
I think we're going to encounter more instances like this- because people think that with the world at their fingertips- the world wants to hear what they have to say. Even if someone along the line told this guy that the story was borderline offensive (and that's putting it quite lightly)- I'm sure he thought, "Well, I think it's funny. So I bet other people do." Give him an open mic, a camera and away he goes.
So congrats, Second City cook. You violated a woman and got 15 minutes of fame. Was it worth it?
Tuesday, August 30, 2011
T-Rex and I are best friends
I can sometimes be quite impatient- much like T-Rex. Stupid life cookie. Plus- I figure a good "your mom" joke always starts the day off better.
Monday, August 29, 2011
Civil Rights Era Stereotypes
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/29/opinion/dangerous-white-stereotypes.html?hp&gwh=1E2A2B5F38E33B334C09941E3DD0AABE
So there's this movie called "The Help". I guess it's a big deal. I'm not dying to see it or anything (in all actuality, I probably won't see it). But from what I gather, all of the hullabaloo comes from this- the story, written about the relationships between black domestic workers and their white employers, was written by a white woman.
What I like about this editorial is that it tries to debunk this whole idea we have that people who do bad things are over the top, Bachmann esque, couldn't miss them if you try- bad. Because "good" people wouldn't be racists. Or anti-Semites. But it's simply not true- there are plenty of people that hold racist or anti-Semitic or xenophobic or homophobic thoughts and tendencies. Sometimes the line between good and bad isn't so black and white. Sometimes it's gray and blurry.
But we love stories of these good people prospering over those bad folks. That's way too easy- and it shouldn't be what we're projecting/teaching the kids. What made triumphing over such adversity like Jim Crow so difficult was that there were many people who, minus their racist thoughts/opinions/tendencies- would be considered upstanding, "good" people. Random example...Charles Lindbergh. People loved Lucky Lindy- hell, we've got a damn state park named after him. We remember him as a pretty great guy, right? Well, he was also kind of a Nazi sympathizer. Whoops- but how could he? He's a "good" person.
So there's this movie called "The Help". I guess it's a big deal. I'm not dying to see it or anything (in all actuality, I probably won't see it). But from what I gather, all of the hullabaloo comes from this- the story, written about the relationships between black domestic workers and their white employers, was written by a white woman.
What I like about this editorial is that it tries to debunk this whole idea we have that people who do bad things are over the top, Bachmann esque, couldn't miss them if you try- bad. Because "good" people wouldn't be racists. Or anti-Semites. But it's simply not true- there are plenty of people that hold racist or anti-Semitic or xenophobic or homophobic thoughts and tendencies. Sometimes the line between good and bad isn't so black and white. Sometimes it's gray and blurry.
But we love stories of these good people prospering over those bad folks. That's way too easy- and it shouldn't be what we're projecting/teaching the kids. What made triumphing over such adversity like Jim Crow so difficult was that there were many people who, minus their racist thoughts/opinions/tendencies- would be considered upstanding, "good" people. Random example...Charles Lindbergh. People loved Lucky Lindy- hell, we've got a damn state park named after him. We remember him as a pretty great guy, right? Well, he was also kind of a Nazi sympathizer. Whoops- but how could he? He's a "good" person.
Think You're an Auditory or Visual Learner
http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/08/29/139973743/think-youre-an-auditory-or-visual-learner-scientists-say-its-unlikely
Moral of the story: there is no one right way to learn. And it took a study to figure this out? People should be paying me for my no nonsense advice.
Moral of the story: there is no one right way to learn. And it took a study to figure this out? People should be paying me for my no nonsense advice.
John Boehner's Defense of Anti Gay Discrimination
http://www.startribune.com/opinion/otherviews/128589618.html
Anyone that has interacted me for over an hour should know that LGBTQA issues are something near and dear to my heart. With family members and close friends who fall under one of the acronyms, I can have a tendency to be quite the outspoken ally.
So when I hear that Boehner is being homophobic, I'm not totally surprised. But why does he need to be hiring lawyers when Obama has made it clear that he doesn't want to defend against challenges to DOMA. You can read this short editorial for yourself, I just want to point out one sentence-
"The House argues that changes to DOMA and other laws that govern marriage would best be achieved through the democratic process."
While it is a great ideal- if we look back at our history, using the ballotbox for issues that involve morality, we usually fail. Do you think the public would have voted to end slavery? Or to end Jim Crow laws/segregation during the Civil Rights movement? I say probably not (though the argument could be made that both of these things would have faded away with time, but I say it would have taken much too long if we wait for things to happen naturally).
I know- people hate when folks like me make connections between the plight of LGBTQ individuals and that of the Civil Rights movement. But the connections are there- there's no denying it. Am I saying that either won if more or less important than the other? No. But in both instances there are laws that are inhibiting a group of people from fully living their lives. And until marriage doesn't become a matter of the state anymore (while it's suggested often, think of how difficult a task it would be to pull off), LGBTQ individuals are being denied a right given to others- all because of hate. Misunderstanding, fear and hate.
So while it's a nice ideal- decisions such as this will probably stem from court cases or actions of the President. Much like the Emancipation Proclamation and court decisions like Brown v. Board of Education. I think the people are "ready" for gay marriage- as the baby boomers age and die, the younger generations are much more accepting. But again, why should we have to wait that long?
Anyone that has interacted me for over an hour should know that LGBTQA issues are something near and dear to my heart. With family members and close friends who fall under one of the acronyms, I can have a tendency to be quite the outspoken ally.
So when I hear that Boehner is being homophobic, I'm not totally surprised. But why does he need to be hiring lawyers when Obama has made it clear that he doesn't want to defend against challenges to DOMA. You can read this short editorial for yourself, I just want to point out one sentence-
"The House argues that changes to DOMA and other laws that govern marriage would best be achieved through the democratic process."
While it is a great ideal- if we look back at our history, using the ballotbox for issues that involve morality, we usually fail. Do you think the public would have voted to end slavery? Or to end Jim Crow laws/segregation during the Civil Rights movement? I say probably not (though the argument could be made that both of these things would have faded away with time, but I say it would have taken much too long if we wait for things to happen naturally).
I know- people hate when folks like me make connections between the plight of LGBTQ individuals and that of the Civil Rights movement. But the connections are there- there's no denying it. Am I saying that either won if more or less important than the other? No. But in both instances there are laws that are inhibiting a group of people from fully living their lives. And until marriage doesn't become a matter of the state anymore (while it's suggested often, think of how difficult a task it would be to pull off), LGBTQ individuals are being denied a right given to others- all because of hate. Misunderstanding, fear and hate.
So while it's a nice ideal- decisions such as this will probably stem from court cases or actions of the President. Much like the Emancipation Proclamation and court decisions like Brown v. Board of Education. I think the people are "ready" for gay marriage- as the baby boomers age and die, the younger generations are much more accepting. But again, why should we have to wait that long?
Friday, August 26, 2011
Vaccines are Safe!
http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/08/25/139947193/report-vaccines-are-safe-hazards-few-and-far-between?sc=fb&cc=fp
So vaccines are safe- contrary to popular "autism frenzy" belief. I'm sure most of you know about this debate by now, so I won't go into detail.
But coming from Minneapolis, which has the largest Somali immigrant population in the U.S., we are seeing rates rising very quickly of autism diagnoses in children of immigrants. Why? They're not sure- it could be the water (all laden with mercury and other fun chemicals) in refugee camps or it could be something in the diet (specifically the peanut butter like, protein rich stuff they give out). Poor kids- they're parents come to the US from chaos for a better life and then they're hit with this disorder that the parents don't understand or how to deal with. Whenever I see more national news on autism, I never hear about the cultural issues that face this disorder- how are different cultures addressing this new disorder? From my very limited experience many of the Somali parents are quite distraught and don't know what to do when their children are diagnosed on the spectrum. Many times they give in to the children and their behavior. I guess it's not much different across cultures, in that sense.
I knew I had to get out of the school I worked at previously when we were doing a staff training on autism and our director of Special Ed (that's right, the director) went on and on about this whole vaccine nonsense. She totally bought into it. Now, I know there is something to be said about slowing down the process and not inundating kids with so many vaccines all at once- but to think they cause autism? I mean, come on...
So vaccines are safe- contrary to popular "autism frenzy" belief. I'm sure most of you know about this debate by now, so I won't go into detail.
But coming from Minneapolis, which has the largest Somali immigrant population in the U.S., we are seeing rates rising very quickly of autism diagnoses in children of immigrants. Why? They're not sure- it could be the water (all laden with mercury and other fun chemicals) in refugee camps or it could be something in the diet (specifically the peanut butter like, protein rich stuff they give out). Poor kids- they're parents come to the US from chaos for a better life and then they're hit with this disorder that the parents don't understand or how to deal with. Whenever I see more national news on autism, I never hear about the cultural issues that face this disorder- how are different cultures addressing this new disorder? From my very limited experience many of the Somali parents are quite distraught and don't know what to do when their children are diagnosed on the spectrum. Many times they give in to the children and their behavior. I guess it's not much different across cultures, in that sense.
I knew I had to get out of the school I worked at previously when we were doing a staff training on autism and our director of Special Ed (that's right, the director) went on and on about this whole vaccine nonsense. She totally bought into it. Now, I know there is something to be said about slowing down the process and not inundating kids with so many vaccines all at once- but to think they cause autism? I mean, come on...
6 Ways You Stay Limited and Stuck in Your Career
http://money.usnews.com/money/blogs/outside-voices-careers/2011/08/25/6-ways-you-stay-limited-and-stuck-in-your-career
While I am employed, I am hoping to make a "career change" within the next year or two. And when I'm not bogged down by class work, I tend to think ahead, post MLIS. Silly? Yes. But it passes the time, I suppose.
This article is hokey, I'll admit. But while the economy is a big factor for getting a job/keeping a job- I think attitude plays a big part. I worked at the same charter school for 3 years. The first year I wasn't thinking of changing jobs- but about halfway through the second I hit the ground running. I job searched (and not just in education- I was willing to work almost anywhere) for almost 2 years and only got a few interviews. It was a not fun experience- you self doubt, degrade yourself and overall feel like you're in a rut. In comparing notes with other friends who've been unemployed or job searched/searching during this economy- similar feelings abound. And while I felt pretty hopeless, I tried to use that for motivation. It was hard, but in the end all the negative feelings I felt towards my job I channeled into finding something better. And whenever I talk to people who are experiencing the same feelings as me and are seriously self doubting their skills- I had a great interview for my current job after probably my worst weekend in a while (not the worst ever, but not great either)- ended a seven year relationship and my kitchen flooded. The plumber literally left 30 mins before I had to leave for the interview.
So while it's easy to pass off an article like this as hokey- it does offer good advice. Don't self doubt, take chances and just keep on truckin'. If you feel you're getting nowhere, take a step back and evaluate your process- maybe there's something you can tweak.
I thought I was a long shot as well- a background in education and now I work on databases all day.
While I am employed, I am hoping to make a "career change" within the next year or two. And when I'm not bogged down by class work, I tend to think ahead, post MLIS. Silly? Yes. But it passes the time, I suppose.
This article is hokey, I'll admit. But while the economy is a big factor for getting a job/keeping a job- I think attitude plays a big part. I worked at the same charter school for 3 years. The first year I wasn't thinking of changing jobs- but about halfway through the second I hit the ground running. I job searched (and not just in education- I was willing to work almost anywhere) for almost 2 years and only got a few interviews. It was a not fun experience- you self doubt, degrade yourself and overall feel like you're in a rut. In comparing notes with other friends who've been unemployed or job searched/searching during this economy- similar feelings abound. And while I felt pretty hopeless, I tried to use that for motivation. It was hard, but in the end all the negative feelings I felt towards my job I channeled into finding something better. And whenever I talk to people who are experiencing the same feelings as me and are seriously self doubting their skills- I had a great interview for my current job after probably my worst weekend in a while (not the worst ever, but not great either)- ended a seven year relationship and my kitchen flooded. The plumber literally left 30 mins before I had to leave for the interview.
So while it's easy to pass off an article like this as hokey- it does offer good advice. Don't self doubt, take chances and just keep on truckin'. If you feel you're getting nowhere, take a step back and evaluate your process- maybe there's something you can tweak.
I thought I was a long shot as well- a background in education and now I work on databases all day.
Thursday, August 25, 2011
"How to Fix Our Math Education"
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/25/opinion/how-to-fix-our-math-education.html?_r=1&hp&gwh=73C45DE7B6661EC4AE63332ACB1AC635
Short editorial that brings up something I love to talk/debate about: the state of education in the U.S.
The editorial makes an interesting argument towards more "real life" math teaching. I can't say I completely disagree. As my days as a para with the 6th graders- I pretty much learned 6th grade math again. Probably a good thing.
But I'm glad that the editorial points out clearly that this problem with how we teach math (and other subjects) has been accelerated by No Child Left Behind (NCLB). NCLB tries to make blanket assumptions and sets impossible standards. By 2014, when these "goals" are to be met- every school would be on "the list". No schools would be making Annual Yearly Progress (AYP). NCLB has seriously messed up our schools. We focus on teaching materials that will be tested, and really just teaching students test taking skills. Whoops, we forgot about teaching critical thinking and creativity.
But going back to the "old ways" won't work either- because our culture has greatly changed. It will take a great cultural revolution if we expect education to go back to the way it used to be (which is over nostalgic, because our education system has always had problems...but that would be quite the tangent)- many adults grew up feeling failed by the system and have passed that bitterness on to their children, who don't take school seriously. That and there is a great number of students whose lives are much too complicated and then pile school on top of that. Kids want to learn- but testing the hell out of them isn't the way to reach them. It's going to take everyone realizing the part they play and working to making things better.
Working in education was part of the reason I went back to grad school. Working with middle school age kids made me realize how they'd been failed. How regardless of whether they had acquired the proper skills needed to advance, they were passed along each grade level to become someone else's "problem". These kids lacked the critical thinking skills to know how to search for current events and find quality information. They had no idea how to do research, and while there are many quality teachers trying to do the best they can- it really comes down to a test for their professional livelihood, so non tested things are on the wayside.
I read a book by Diane Ravitch that I thought gave a good analysis on ways we've gone wrong. Notice I said ways- because this utter failure cannot be traced back to one person/place/thing. It's a combination of many things.
It's a daunting task and it's a lot to ask- but it needs to be done. I know I didn't grow up with the greatest education, but it was much better than what I witness today. And I feel a civic duty to try and impart my skills and wisdom to help students become the best people they can- people who can read, write, interpret, and think for themselves. Not people who can figure out the best answer to a multiple choice question. We all need to work together- schools, libraries, government, businesses- everyone benefits from a better educated population.
Can I offer answers or solutions? No, and I don't believe I'm qualified to do so. There are too many cooks in the kitchen as it is.
Short editorial that brings up something I love to talk/debate about: the state of education in the U.S.
The editorial makes an interesting argument towards more "real life" math teaching. I can't say I completely disagree. As my days as a para with the 6th graders- I pretty much learned 6th grade math again. Probably a good thing.
But I'm glad that the editorial points out clearly that this problem with how we teach math (and other subjects) has been accelerated by No Child Left Behind (NCLB). NCLB tries to make blanket assumptions and sets impossible standards. By 2014, when these "goals" are to be met- every school would be on "the list". No schools would be making Annual Yearly Progress (AYP). NCLB has seriously messed up our schools. We focus on teaching materials that will be tested, and really just teaching students test taking skills. Whoops, we forgot about teaching critical thinking and creativity.
But going back to the "old ways" won't work either- because our culture has greatly changed. It will take a great cultural revolution if we expect education to go back to the way it used to be (which is over nostalgic, because our education system has always had problems...but that would be quite the tangent)- many adults grew up feeling failed by the system and have passed that bitterness on to their children, who don't take school seriously. That and there is a great number of students whose lives are much too complicated and then pile school on top of that. Kids want to learn- but testing the hell out of them isn't the way to reach them. It's going to take everyone realizing the part they play and working to making things better.
Working in education was part of the reason I went back to grad school. Working with middle school age kids made me realize how they'd been failed. How regardless of whether they had acquired the proper skills needed to advance, they were passed along each grade level to become someone else's "problem". These kids lacked the critical thinking skills to know how to search for current events and find quality information. They had no idea how to do research, and while there are many quality teachers trying to do the best they can- it really comes down to a test for their professional livelihood, so non tested things are on the wayside.
I read a book by Diane Ravitch that I thought gave a good analysis on ways we've gone wrong. Notice I said ways- because this utter failure cannot be traced back to one person/place/thing. It's a combination of many things.
It's a daunting task and it's a lot to ask- but it needs to be done. I know I didn't grow up with the greatest education, but it was much better than what I witness today. And I feel a civic duty to try and impart my skills and wisdom to help students become the best people they can- people who can read, write, interpret, and think for themselves. Not people who can figure out the best answer to a multiple choice question. We all need to work together- schools, libraries, government, businesses- everyone benefits from a better educated population.
Can I offer answers or solutions? No, and I don't believe I'm qualified to do so. There are too many cooks in the kitchen as it is.
Online Enterprises Gain Foothold as Path to a College Degree
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/25/education/25future.html?hp&gwh=4C11308CEE6C6F4B4D73B53C5F0812C8
While this article focuses more on for profit universities or for profit programs that help piecemeal together a degree, as a student in an online program, I still found it of interest.
There is a definite bias towards any sort of online learning- that it's easier, you don't have to work as hard, it is inferior to "regular" learning. I'll admit- I still have those biases lurking around. As a grad student- I'm doing well. Sometimes I think too well. But it is different than undergrad- you are studying something you're fully interested/invested in. And as most can attest- I'm not always the best student (examples include: weekly trivia, multiple concerts, etc.)...I have this bad habit of choosing fun over sleep. So sometimes I wonder if grad school is easier for me because it's online- but then I think that I have scheduled my life out quite well so that I do a lot of reading on the bus, get a lot of posting done at work (because you all know how hard I work-ha!) and always leave Sundays, Mondays and Wednesdays open for school stuff.
But I am biased towards online undergraduate degrees. I think students miss out on socialization, learning how to be around and work with all different kinds of people. The times are changing- many students have to work while getting their degree, and online programs offer much more flexibility so they can finish more quickly. Plus, online education eliminates any housing/board fees. So maybe instead of turning our collective noses up against online learning- dare we embrace it and try to regulate it to make it better and more respected?
I'm somewhat nostalgic and think there's something to be said about the old way of education- 4 years on campus, etc etc. But that doesn't work for everyone- and I feel like many who are attending online and/or for profit colleges and universities are getting the short end of the stick. There needs to be WAY more regulation for them so that the degrees that are awarded are respected. But on the other hand, it's also a cultural thing. There are many who are quite elitist (as the article mentions) who pass over these sorts of degrees. Job applicants who may be otherwise very qualified aren't given the second look because of where they got their degree.
But whenever I get a weird look when I tell people I'm getting my Master's online, I'm always quick to remind them- Minnesota only has one school that offers an MLIS program. Why didn't I apply there? Because at the time, they'd lost their ALA accredidation and couldn't 100% say they'd get it back (they did). Nice, private, well respected school- but doesn't that seem fishy? I'll take my online degree through a ranked program at a public university any day, thanks.
While this article focuses more on for profit universities or for profit programs that help piecemeal together a degree, as a student in an online program, I still found it of interest.
There is a definite bias towards any sort of online learning- that it's easier, you don't have to work as hard, it is inferior to "regular" learning. I'll admit- I still have those biases lurking around. As a grad student- I'm doing well. Sometimes I think too well. But it is different than undergrad- you are studying something you're fully interested/invested in. And as most can attest- I'm not always the best student (examples include: weekly trivia, multiple concerts, etc.)...I have this bad habit of choosing fun over sleep. So sometimes I wonder if grad school is easier for me because it's online- but then I think that I have scheduled my life out quite well so that I do a lot of reading on the bus, get a lot of posting done at work (because you all know how hard I work-ha!) and always leave Sundays, Mondays and Wednesdays open for school stuff.
But I am biased towards online undergraduate degrees. I think students miss out on socialization, learning how to be around and work with all different kinds of people. The times are changing- many students have to work while getting their degree, and online programs offer much more flexibility so they can finish more quickly. Plus, online education eliminates any housing/board fees. So maybe instead of turning our collective noses up against online learning- dare we embrace it and try to regulate it to make it better and more respected?
I'm somewhat nostalgic and think there's something to be said about the old way of education- 4 years on campus, etc etc. But that doesn't work for everyone- and I feel like many who are attending online and/or for profit colleges and universities are getting the short end of the stick. There needs to be WAY more regulation for them so that the degrees that are awarded are respected. But on the other hand, it's also a cultural thing. There are many who are quite elitist (as the article mentions) who pass over these sorts of degrees. Job applicants who may be otherwise very qualified aren't given the second look because of where they got their degree.
But whenever I get a weird look when I tell people I'm getting my Master's online, I'm always quick to remind them- Minnesota only has one school that offers an MLIS program. Why didn't I apply there? Because at the time, they'd lost their ALA accredidation and couldn't 100% say they'd get it back (they did). Nice, private, well respected school- but doesn't that seem fishy? I'll take my online degree through a ranked program at a public university any day, thanks.
US May Back Mortgage Refinancing for Millions
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/25/business/economy/us-may-back-mortgage-refinancing-for-millions.html?_r=1&hp&gwh=E35686A18BA2E632A84248D0C9FE7C2F
So, I am not a homeowner. But someday I'd like to be, because throwing my money out the window every month on rent is getting old. While the first proposal mentioned in the article seems like a glimmer of hope for people experiencing the housing crisis, I have my doubts it will ever happen. The contradictory optimist/realist in me has high hopes, but if there's anything that can be counted on, it's the government disappointing you.
I know they say this is the best time to buy, but yet I read again and again that fear is what keeps people out of the market. And I know those feelings- it is definitely tempting to look at low housing prices and get all dreamy and shit. But then one has to take a step back- I've got student loan debt, and let's face it, no job is really safe anymore (or so it seems). So I continue my existence as a basement troll. It suits me well :)
I wonder what homeowners think of this- anyone?
So, I am not a homeowner. But someday I'd like to be, because throwing my money out the window every month on rent is getting old. While the first proposal mentioned in the article seems like a glimmer of hope for people experiencing the housing crisis, I have my doubts it will ever happen. The contradictory optimist/realist in me has high hopes, but if there's anything that can be counted on, it's the government disappointing you.
I know they say this is the best time to buy, but yet I read again and again that fear is what keeps people out of the market. And I know those feelings- it is definitely tempting to look at low housing prices and get all dreamy and shit. But then one has to take a step back- I've got student loan debt, and let's face it, no job is really safe anymore (or so it seems). So I continue my existence as a basement troll. It suits me well :)
I wonder what homeowners think of this- anyone?
So...what this tells me is that I need to get glasses if I want to really become a librarian. Also, don't show the earnings part to Dave. I've still got him convinced that librarians are not rich and he can't quit his job (which, once I start paying students loans back, will be quite true).
Also- to give credit where credit is due (and because my lack of doing so was pointed out): Lovely infographic comes courtesy of Sam.
Wednesday, August 24, 2011
Complaints on Hip Replacements Soar
I'm sure you're like- why do I care about hip replacement problems? Well, for those that don't know my extensive personal history, my dad has had two hip replacement surgeries. To make a long story short: back in my elementary school days, my dad was a truck driver. While driving, he came over a hill and discovered backed up traffic for construction past the proper signage. He chose to drive off the road and put himself in the ditch (and grave danger) instead of hitting another car and possibly hurting another person. So multiple injuries (to put it lightly). He had emergency surgeries, including hip replacement. That was over 15 years ago so it was a fully metal hip replacement.
This article talks about rising complaints from patients (thankfully for my dad, most hip replacements last about 15 years, as his did). This quote is kind of upseting- "Under FDA rules, many all metal devices were sold without testing in patients or without a requirement that producers track their performance." Why would that seem like a good idea to anyone?
My dad has since had another hip replacement almost 2 years ago, and because of technological advances in prosthetic body parts- it has no metal. But the last few years he had a metal hip he was in excrutiating pain most of the time. It wasn't until the next replacement that we found out it was because the metal prosthesis had been rubbing away his bone. Ouch.
So I read about all these complaints, and what really makes me feel dismayed is that there are many people who suffer through this pain, who deal with the malfunctioning prostheses because their health insurance can't/won't help them. Thankfully my dad has the VA as an advocate and doesn't have to worry much about premuims and deductibles and all that fun stuff. All I can do is hope is that something is done for these people- though it is probably unlikely to happen.
This article talks about rising complaints from patients (thankfully for my dad, most hip replacements last about 15 years, as his did). This quote is kind of upseting- "Under FDA rules, many all metal devices were sold without testing in patients or without a requirement that producers track their performance." Why would that seem like a good idea to anyone?
My dad has since had another hip replacement almost 2 years ago, and because of technological advances in prosthetic body parts- it has no metal. But the last few years he had a metal hip he was in excrutiating pain most of the time. It wasn't until the next replacement that we found out it was because the metal prosthesis had been rubbing away his bone. Ouch.
So I read about all these complaints, and what really makes me feel dismayed is that there are many people who suffer through this pain, who deal with the malfunctioning prostheses because their health insurance can't/won't help them. Thankfully my dad has the VA as an advocate and doesn't have to worry much about premuims and deductibles and all that fun stuff. All I can do is hope is that something is done for these people- though it is probably unlikely to happen.
Tuesday, August 23, 2011
Students and Librarians
This article (if you haven't figured it out by now, whatever I'm talking about can be reached by clicking the link/title) is quite interesting and brings up something we talk about in grad school A LOT. How do we get people, who are in need of help, to ask for it? Why are students especially (and more especially college students) afraid to ask librarians for help?
Hoop or not- while I always considered myself a decent researcher, I'm learning about doing research for all subjects in grad school. Why? So I can help you!
This is exactly why I want to work in a public library- so many schools are getting rid of their school librarians as their budgets dwindle to nothing. Which makes me sad :( So where do students have to turn? Well, lots of places- Google, Wikipedia, etc. But hopefully they'll also turn to their library, where we can show them various resources, how to find them and guide them through the process. It's all about spreading the info, kids.
Hoop or not- while I always considered myself a decent researcher, I'm learning about doing research for all subjects in grad school. Why? So I can help you!
This is exactly why I want to work in a public library- so many schools are getting rid of their school librarians as their budgets dwindle to nothing. Which makes me sad :( So where do students have to turn? Well, lots of places- Google, Wikipedia, etc. But hopefully they'll also turn to their library, where we can show them various resources, how to find them and guide them through the process. It's all about spreading the info, kids.
Is it a hoop?
It's the time of year where school is starting up again and so you begin to hear more and more about the rising cost of college tuition. As a grad student, while I feel it's always the same old song and dance, I can't help but read.
Ah, debt. I know it all too well. I decided that I wanted to attend a smaller college for undergrad. Was it expensive? Yes. I got some assistance through scholarships, but I knew what I was getting into. I don't regret going to Simpson- I learned a lot in my time there and felt I was prepared for the real world.
After working for a few years, I decided that I wanted to combine my two passions- information and helping people. Library science just seemed like a good fit. So, grad school. But this time it was different. Don't get me wrong- I enjoy my classes and do find them valuable. But sometimes I feel like I'm just jumping through a hoop. Undergrad really gave me some great lifelong skills and I feel with grad school, many of the skills they teach us could easily be learned on the job. Outside of these skills we mostly discuss theory, ethics and history. While I enjoy learning all about those things, I'd rather not pay almost $3,000 per class.
I hate this limbo that I feel I'm in- I really want to work in the Library Science field in some capacity and to do so, I need my MLIS. And I am in one of the best programs in the country.
Is it just me? Am I just a jaded know it all?
But I digress. Either way, I'm in the program. I guess my frustration with this "jump through the hoop" feeling really boils down to all the debt I'm taking on. But the silver lining I have to keep reminding myself about is the end result- working in a field I love.
But I'm quite lucky- while I was by no means from a rich family, I came from a family who supports me in my education endeavors and if I needed financial help, would do their best to help me. There are many who do not have such a luxury. Why did getting a college education become so out of reach, especially when a BA is almost a requirement to get a job that pays a living wage? I hear from pundits that they feel Obama is trying to incite class warfare when it isn't really there- but this is a prime example of the grave disparities that exist. If we continue to let college rates rise at crazy percentages, what will happen? Many jobs that don't require a college education have been outsourced- what will we do with all these supposedly undereducated folks? Will we finally change job requirements that look at skills, and not just a piece of paper.
Ah, debt. I know it all too well. I decided that I wanted to attend a smaller college for undergrad. Was it expensive? Yes. I got some assistance through scholarships, but I knew what I was getting into. I don't regret going to Simpson- I learned a lot in my time there and felt I was prepared for the real world.
After working for a few years, I decided that I wanted to combine my two passions- information and helping people. Library science just seemed like a good fit. So, grad school. But this time it was different. Don't get me wrong- I enjoy my classes and do find them valuable. But sometimes I feel like I'm just jumping through a hoop. Undergrad really gave me some great lifelong skills and I feel with grad school, many of the skills they teach us could easily be learned on the job. Outside of these skills we mostly discuss theory, ethics and history. While I enjoy learning all about those things, I'd rather not pay almost $3,000 per class.
I hate this limbo that I feel I'm in- I really want to work in the Library Science field in some capacity and to do so, I need my MLIS. And I am in one of the best programs in the country.
Is it just me? Am I just a jaded know it all?
But I digress. Either way, I'm in the program. I guess my frustration with this "jump through the hoop" feeling really boils down to all the debt I'm taking on. But the silver lining I have to keep reminding myself about is the end result- working in a field I love.
But I'm quite lucky- while I was by no means from a rich family, I came from a family who supports me in my education endeavors and if I needed financial help, would do their best to help me. There are many who do not have such a luxury. Why did getting a college education become so out of reach, especially when a BA is almost a requirement to get a job that pays a living wage? I hear from pundits that they feel Obama is trying to incite class warfare when it isn't really there- but this is a prime example of the grave disparities that exist. If we continue to let college rates rise at crazy percentages, what will happen? Many jobs that don't require a college education have been outsourced- what will we do with all these supposedly undereducated folks? Will we finally change job requirements that look at skills, and not just a piece of paper.
Turkey Says it Killed 100 Kurdish Separatists
Think back. Way back. To WWI. Ottoman Empire- dismantled. Armenian genocide. Kurds promised their own autonomous land. Didn't happen. Didn't happen again after WWII. We pretty much left the Kurds in limbo- part of their native lands in Iraq, part in Turkey. Turkey and Iraq leadership both not fans of the Kurds (you know, hence the nerve gas by Sadam and multiple killings over the years by the Turks).
It just makes one ponder- how are we so dumbfounded by these militant groups when many times we've cultivated this hate? Of course, I'm not excusing violent behavior. But I think the West needs to realize that we have played a role in the misery of others for a long time.
It just makes one ponder- how are we so dumbfounded by these militant groups when many times we've cultivated this hate? Of course, I'm not excusing violent behavior. But I think the West needs to realize that we have played a role in the misery of others for a long time.
"For Obama, A Moment to Savor, if Briefly"
So we all know what's going down in Libya. If you don't, well it may be about time to come out from under the rock for a few minutes. Then go back under, because let's face it, you're probably better off there.
Thoughts:
Seems a little early to be celebrating any sort of victory, don't you think? Or did we all forget that lovely image of GWB all flight suited up on a ship saying "Mission Accomplished"? Learn from the past, Obama. Or you're doomed to repeat it. Though, to be fair- Obama is being much more muted about it.
Thoughts:
Seems a little early to be celebrating any sort of victory, don't you think? Or did we all forget that lovely image of GWB all flight suited up on a ship saying "Mission Accomplished"? Learn from the past, Obama. Or you're doomed to repeat it. Though, to be fair- Obama is being much more muted about it.
Monday, August 22, 2011
Inaugural Post
Welcome!
So, as a lover of information (learning new information, how it's shared, the drawbacks of information overload, etc) I decided a blog would be the best place to share. Plus, my mom said I'm on Facebook too much. As I enter my last year of grad school towards my MLIS, I thought it couldn't hurt to have an organized blog under my belt (looks better than sending prospective employers to social media pages, at least in the library world).
So this space will sort of replace some of the things I loved to do on Facebook- news links specifically. I'm a news junkie, if that wasn't already obvious. I enjoy finding off the beaten path news that I find relevant and important and sharing it. This space will help me do that as well as share my own thoughts without clogging up a Facebook feed (trust me, you'll thank me when my 2 a day NY Times articles aren't there anymore!). While I'm sure that was annoying to some, every time I mused about quitting that, I had multiple friends tell me they enjoy my postings/thoughts.
So welcome friends! This is a space where I may occasionally share my opinion (ha!)- but don't hesistate to share yours. I am a firm believer in healthy debate, as I believe it encourages learning as well as helps strengthen your own arguments and convictions. We're always evolving our thoughts and ideas, so use this venue to help me do so :)
So, as a lover of information (learning new information, how it's shared, the drawbacks of information overload, etc) I decided a blog would be the best place to share. Plus, my mom said I'm on Facebook too much. As I enter my last year of grad school towards my MLIS, I thought it couldn't hurt to have an organized blog under my belt (looks better than sending prospective employers to social media pages, at least in the library world).
So this space will sort of replace some of the things I loved to do on Facebook- news links specifically. I'm a news junkie, if that wasn't already obvious. I enjoy finding off the beaten path news that I find relevant and important and sharing it. This space will help me do that as well as share my own thoughts without clogging up a Facebook feed (trust me, you'll thank me when my 2 a day NY Times articles aren't there anymore!). While I'm sure that was annoying to some, every time I mused about quitting that, I had multiple friends tell me they enjoy my postings/thoughts.
So welcome friends! This is a space where I may occasionally share my opinion (ha!)- but don't hesistate to share yours. I am a firm believer in healthy debate, as I believe it encourages learning as well as helps strengthen your own arguments and convictions. We're always evolving our thoughts and ideas, so use this venue to help me do so :)
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)