http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2011/12/20/opinion/20111220_DISUNIONSS.html?gwh=8311784C98C3FA1D3C8D322C3E8E4735
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/21/what-remains/?smid=fb-disunion
The blog entry is pretty short- but I think it illustrates a point that is important in the study of the Civil War (and really, history in a more general sense)- sometimes to understand why people did what they did, you've got to see their lives. How they lived. If you don't immerse yourself, you'll find yourself bringing your own biases into the study process. Granted, it is interpreting our own biases that helps us understand history, helps us relate to the past, gives new insight into oft mentioned topics. It's a delicate balance to hold- don't want to bring too much of the present into the past, but don't want to forget how hindsight can serve us in the study of history.
It's magnificent to see some of these old building still standing, dilapidated as they are. Maybe I just have a thing for abandoned buildings. But to stand in such an old building, it just feels special, because you can imagine all those who have set foot there as well.
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
Monday, December 19, 2011
Warming Permafrost
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/17/science/earth/warming-arctic-permafrost-fuels-climate-change-worries.html?pagewanted=1&ref=science&gwh=2B0E0832E8281427C0A83E44734E0A7D
Still blissfully ignorant of global warming? Even if I tried really hard, I just don't see how I could convince myself that global warming is a hoax. Obviously I need to be hanging out more with my bff Michelle Bachmann. Facts schmacts.
Still blissfully ignorant of global warming? Even if I tried really hard, I just don't see how I could convince myself that global warming is a hoax. Obviously I need to be hanging out more with my bff Michelle Bachmann. Facts schmacts.
Another sinking in Russia
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2011/12/19/world/europe/international-us-russia-platform-raft.html?_r=1&ref=world&gwh=DF8DD9129E0EF1094069CD6AF58C71CC
So many boats/etc sinking in Russia. It's pretty awful. Supposedly there were glimpses of a life raft, though it hasn't been confirmed or found. If not, unfortunately the body count will continue to climb above the already found 16. Gah, what an awful way to go- drowing in the icy cold waters near Russia.
So many boats/etc sinking in Russia. It's pretty awful. Supposedly there were glimpses of a life raft, though it hasn't been confirmed or found. If not, unfortunately the body count will continue to climb above the already found 16. Gah, what an awful way to go- drowing in the icy cold waters near Russia.
Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Transgender Children
http://bostonglobe.com/metro/2011/12/11/led-child-who-simply-knew/SsH1U9Pn9JKArTiumZdxaL/story.html
Yeah, yeah- I know. Where have I been? Finals! Which could be considered a lame excuse except that a) finals are time consuming and hard, b) I'm a classic procrastinator, and c) one of my great friends came into town for a visit. Busy busy bee I am.
But this article was really touching, taking a honest look at transgender children- which is an issue that never gets enough press.
Yeah, yeah- I know. Where have I been? Finals! Which could be considered a lame excuse except that a) finals are time consuming and hard, b) I'm a classic procrastinator, and c) one of my great friends came into town for a visit. Busy busy bee I am.
But this article was really touching, taking a honest look at transgender children- which is an issue that never gets enough press.
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
British Embassy stormed in Iran
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/30/world/middleeast/tehran-protesters-storm-british-embassy.html?_r=1&hp
I wonder how much it takes before a country withdraws its diplomats and closes its embassy? Not saying I think it should happen in this case, but I wonder if there is a set criteria. I mean, if we don't like Iran and its nuclear program, why have our diplomats there? Time and again Iran has made it pretty clear that it despises the West (well, and Israel). Has anyone ever heard of a country closing its embassy (especially as a form of protest)?
I wonder how much it takes before a country withdraws its diplomats and closes its embassy? Not saying I think it should happen in this case, but I wonder if there is a set criteria. I mean, if we don't like Iran and its nuclear program, why have our diplomats there? Time and again Iran has made it pretty clear that it despises the West (well, and Israel). Has anyone ever heard of a country closing its embassy (especially as a form of protest)?
Friday, November 18, 2011
UN Tribunal Business- Khmer Rouge
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/19/world/asia/un-court-appeals-release-of-khmer-rouge-defendant.html?ref=world&gwh=B203308281610D28AA36CDB681FEEAAA
So completely random, but on my Facebook I keep a link in my profile to this amazing video that I will randomly watch from time to time. It's a short video the NY Times did with Dith Pran shortly before he lost his life to cancer. His story of being a prisoner with the Khmer Rouge, was the basis for the movie The Killing Fields. I don't know why, but I watched it yesterday. It's from 2008, yet it still moves me every time:
http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2Fpackages%2Fhtml%2Fmultimedia%2F20080320_DITH_PRAN_LAST_WORD_FEATURE%2Findex.html&h=BAQG3Tll1
(If the link doesn't work...it's on my Facebook profile)
And then today I see this story. It has been very difficult and taken a very long time to put many of the higher ups in the Khmer Rouge on trial for genocide/crimes against humanity/etc. Pol Pot died before he could be put on trial- and a lot of people were pissed about that, so they really put some effort into getting the others. They sentenced Duch (who ran Tuol Sleng prison, notorious killing facility) already and this woman in the article and her husband were leaders in the Khmer Rouge government. Recently her dementia has progressed far enough that doctors have determined her unfit for trial, which prosecutors are now appealing.
So questions that came to my mind are this:
-Should they just try her anyway, as it will be a symbol for the Cambodian people more than anything?
-If they do try her, what does that say for all the other cases of people who are mentally incapable being tried or sentenced or executed?
- Can they put her under house arrest if they do in fact release her, as a sort of compromise?
It's a sticky situation- on the one hand you want to try this woman because she did do some atrocious things to people. On the other, as a justice system, no matter how difficult or controversial, they need to uphold the code of law. She is probably mentally unstable to stand trial. I don't know what the UN should do...which is why I'm not a judge.
So completely random, but on my Facebook I keep a link in my profile to this amazing video that I will randomly watch from time to time. It's a short video the NY Times did with Dith Pran shortly before he lost his life to cancer. His story of being a prisoner with the Khmer Rouge, was the basis for the movie The Killing Fields. I don't know why, but I watched it yesterday. It's from 2008, yet it still moves me every time:
http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2Fpackages%2Fhtml%2Fmultimedia%2F20080320_DITH_PRAN_LAST_WORD_FEATURE%2Findex.html&h=BAQG3Tll1
(If the link doesn't work...it's on my Facebook profile)
And then today I see this story. It has been very difficult and taken a very long time to put many of the higher ups in the Khmer Rouge on trial for genocide/crimes against humanity/etc. Pol Pot died before he could be put on trial- and a lot of people were pissed about that, so they really put some effort into getting the others. They sentenced Duch (who ran Tuol Sleng prison, notorious killing facility) already and this woman in the article and her husband were leaders in the Khmer Rouge government. Recently her dementia has progressed far enough that doctors have determined her unfit for trial, which prosecutors are now appealing.
So questions that came to my mind are this:
-Should they just try her anyway, as it will be a symbol for the Cambodian people more than anything?
-If they do try her, what does that say for all the other cases of people who are mentally incapable being tried or sentenced or executed?
- Can they put her under house arrest if they do in fact release her, as a sort of compromise?
It's a sticky situation- on the one hand you want to try this woman because she did do some atrocious things to people. On the other, as a justice system, no matter how difficult or controversial, they need to uphold the code of law. She is probably mentally unstable to stand trial. I don't know what the UN should do...which is why I'm not a judge.
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
Fight Obesity with Healthy School Lunches...Maybe Next Year
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/16/us/politics/congress-blocks-new-rules-on-school-lunches.html?ref=health
So Congress, continuing its stellar track record of really tackling the tough problems, blocked any changes that were proposed by the USDA to make school lunches more healthy.
Favorite pull quote:
"Food companies including ConAgra, Coca-Cola, DelMonte Foods and makers of frozen pizza like Schwann argued that the proposed rules would raise the cost of meals and require food that many children would throw away. The companies called the Congressional response reasonable, adding that the Agriculture Department went too far in trying to improve nutrition in school lunches."
So it's evil to improve nutrition? Good job Congress...way to totally bow down to big companies. And you wonder why you have people protesting across the country about the heavy hand of big business.
Oh, and FYI to food companies: putting more tomato paste on pizza is not going to drastically change the taste of your sub par frozen pizza either way. Also, if kids are only presented with healthy options, they will eat it. No kid is going to throw their entire lunch away every day because there aren't enough processed foods offered.
So Congress, continuing its stellar track record of really tackling the tough problems, blocked any changes that were proposed by the USDA to make school lunches more healthy.
Favorite pull quote:
"Food companies including ConAgra, Coca-Cola, DelMonte Foods and makers of frozen pizza like Schwann argued that the proposed rules would raise the cost of meals and require food that many children would throw away. The companies called the Congressional response reasonable, adding that the Agriculture Department went too far in trying to improve nutrition in school lunches."
So it's evil to improve nutrition? Good job Congress...way to totally bow down to big companies. And you wonder why you have people protesting across the country about the heavy hand of big business.
Oh, and FYI to food companies: putting more tomato paste on pizza is not going to drastically change the taste of your sub par frozen pizza either way. Also, if kids are only presented with healthy options, they will eat it. No kid is going to throw their entire lunch away every day because there aren't enough processed foods offered.
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Slideshow Time!
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/11/09/world/asia/20111109-NKOREA-GOBIG.html?ref=world#1
Great NY Times slideshow about North Korea. Lots of bold colors- really breathed life into a country that seems so gray and sterile. I'd recommend the documentary "A State of Mind" as a great companion to this slideshow- BBC doc about life in North Korea for two girls as they prepare for Mass Games (giant choreographed gymnastics performance).
Great NY Times slideshow about North Korea. Lots of bold colors- really breathed life into a country that seems so gray and sterile. I'd recommend the documentary "A State of Mind" as a great companion to this slideshow- BBC doc about life in North Korea for two girls as they prepare for Mass Games (giant choreographed gymnastics performance).
Tuesday, November 8, 2011
Wall Street Journal- official downer.
http://graphicsweb.wsj.com/documents/NILF1111/#term=
Want a list of what major will leave you unemployed and with debt up to your ears? Well, WSJ has just the list to kill your dreams. Or make you feel really awesome, depending.
Question I have about this (and if I missed something, please, point out my omissions):
1. Is this regarding students who have a BA in said subject? Or does it take into account Master's and PHD's?
2. Does this take into account people who are working "outside their field"? Meaning, if someone has a degree in History but is working a more IT job, does that count as employed under the history field or IT/Computer Science field?
3. Is teacher unemployment really that low? Because I read/see/hear about teachers being cut right and left. Though I suppose a new graduate may have a good chance of landing a job because they will be paid less than longer tenured teachers.
Also, Library Science did really bad. Really, really bad. But I think it's a problem that has been in the field in the past few years- diversify! As a Master's student, while I would love a job in a library, I know that I have skills that apply to many different jobs. I think the days are long gone where one can expect to get the "stereotype" of a job in their field. Especially in Library Science- we learn so many different skills regarding actually working in a library, different computer programs/platforms/etc, customer service, budgeting, grant writing, amazing research skills- the list could go on. It's just all about taking those skills and realizing that they can be put in many different fields as opposed to just working in a library.
Want a list of what major will leave you unemployed and with debt up to your ears? Well, WSJ has just the list to kill your dreams. Or make you feel really awesome, depending.
Question I have about this (and if I missed something, please, point out my omissions):
1. Is this regarding students who have a BA in said subject? Or does it take into account Master's and PHD's?
2. Does this take into account people who are working "outside their field"? Meaning, if someone has a degree in History but is working a more IT job, does that count as employed under the history field or IT/Computer Science field?
3. Is teacher unemployment really that low? Because I read/see/hear about teachers being cut right and left. Though I suppose a new graduate may have a good chance of landing a job because they will be paid less than longer tenured teachers.
Also, Library Science did really bad. Really, really bad. But I think it's a problem that has been in the field in the past few years- diversify! As a Master's student, while I would love a job in a library, I know that I have skills that apply to many different jobs. I think the days are long gone where one can expect to get the "stereotype" of a job in their field. Especially in Library Science- we learn so many different skills regarding actually working in a library, different computer programs/platforms/etc, customer service, budgeting, grant writing, amazing research skills- the list could go on. It's just all about taking those skills and realizing that they can be put in many different fields as opposed to just working in a library.
Monday, November 7, 2011
Makin' Babies
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/03/opinion/kristof-the-birth-control-solution.html?src=tp&smid=fb-share
This isn't a new idea presented in this editorial- contraception and more importantly, family planning- helps slow down population growth. Yes Virginia, it is that simple! I especially love the analogy "Contraceptives no more cause sex than umbrellas cause rain."
Also, what I think is an important point to bring up and should be hammered out into the public mind over and over- family planning and access to contraceptives is *way* cheaper than supporting families that can't afford all the children. I have yet to hear an argument prove otherwise. I sure can't afford a baby right now, so what seems like a better plan of action- give me cheap access to contraceptives and thus baby free? Or force me (circumstantially, not physically) to have a child I cannot afford and thus must use public assistance (for medical coverage, daycare and Foodstamps) to support? The statistic changes in India and Mexico are stark proof (also read about countries surrounding India and their efforts, like Bangladesh) that when done right, family planning makes a difference.
This isn't a new idea presented in this editorial- contraception and more importantly, family planning- helps slow down population growth. Yes Virginia, it is that simple! I especially love the analogy "Contraceptives no more cause sex than umbrellas cause rain."
Also, what I think is an important point to bring up and should be hammered out into the public mind over and over- family planning and access to contraceptives is *way* cheaper than supporting families that can't afford all the children. I have yet to hear an argument prove otherwise. I sure can't afford a baby right now, so what seems like a better plan of action- give me cheap access to contraceptives and thus baby free? Or force me (circumstantially, not physically) to have a child I cannot afford and thus must use public assistance (for medical coverage, daycare and Foodstamps) to support? The statistic changes in India and Mexico are stark proof (also read about countries surrounding India and their efforts, like Bangladesh) that when done right, family planning makes a difference.
Friday, November 4, 2011
Wait for it...another post about Cancer! Ok, it's also a review of "50/50"
So I finally went and saw 50/50 at the second run theater with my sister. Basic plot for those who don't know- it was written by a guy (who's now a producer/director/Hollywood type) who was diagnosed with cancer in his late 20's. Really bad, there's a pretty good chance you'll die cancer. The reviews and articles I'd read about it intrigued me because they talked about what a realistic treatment it gave to cancer. It provided a balance between the usual stereotypes of either super sick and frail and Lance Armstrong triumph over adversity. I don't know if I would have been affected differently or at all if I hadn't recently lost extended family members to cancer...or work with it every day (while abstractly, it's there and I realize it).
It was nice to see a movie show a character with cancer who goes through many emotions. You can be mad and scared and angry and calm all at the same time. And you don't need to have these life changing epiphanies. I was very pleasantly surprised at Seth Rogen's character, which was partly based on him in real life. The writer/main character has actually been a long time friend of Seth Rogen's and Rogen was there throughout the cancer journey. While he did have moments as that Seth Rogen archetype that we love to laugh at, there were also very poignant moments of him just trying to be a good friend and not be scared of his friend dying. Somehow there were moments in the movie where I cried and then a minute later found myself laughing. But that's how it should be.
Dealing with these sorts of situations is never easy. Maybe it just hit a little close to home for me, I'm not sure. But when the main character was having an important surgery, I was definitely choked up, very much reminded of my own feelings in similar situations- it's hard to send someone away to a life saving surgery that might kill them.
But I think even if you don't know anyone with cancer, this film is a great tool- because someday you will be touched by cancer and it's never easy to deal with. Trying to keep a semblance of normal and the upkeep of those important relationships- that's what this movie excels at.
An Interesting Editorial...
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/04/opinion/the-senate-puts-millionaires-before-jobs.html?_r=1&hp=&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1320419064-HEsPQ9P0+Io+7/wheedPbQ
It's a short editorial, and it's pretty anti-GOP. But if you're someone who's not scouring the newspapers every day like me (and if you are, well, you're awesome), I wonder what you would think of this.
The partisanship in Congress has gotten out of control even moreso than I thought it could. Both sides are accusing the other of introducing bills that they know will fail. Whatever happened to compromise? Because people need jobs- and when I read all of this dribble back and forth about how Liberals just want to bail everyone out and bankrupt the country and Republicans only want to protect the rich and "Read my lips: no new taxes"- and Congress is pretty much doing nothing to help people find jobs. Am I oversimplifying a complex problem? Probably. To get more people in jobs we need to change our tax codes, how we handle loans/debt, public assistance, health care...good God, and now I'm depressed. This is why you have to be pretty much a heartless, soulless being to be in government.
It's a short editorial, and it's pretty anti-GOP. But if you're someone who's not scouring the newspapers every day like me (and if you are, well, you're awesome), I wonder what you would think of this.
The partisanship in Congress has gotten out of control even moreso than I thought it could. Both sides are accusing the other of introducing bills that they know will fail. Whatever happened to compromise? Because people need jobs- and when I read all of this dribble back and forth about how Liberals just want to bail everyone out and bankrupt the country and Republicans only want to protect the rich and "Read my lips: no new taxes"- and Congress is pretty much doing nothing to help people find jobs. Am I oversimplifying a complex problem? Probably. To get more people in jobs we need to change our tax codes, how we handle loans/debt, public assistance, health care...good God, and now I'm depressed. This is why you have to be pretty much a heartless, soulless being to be in government.
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
Kyrgyzstan to close U.S. base
Is it another idle threat to get more money out of the U.S. (hey, it worked last time...)? Or just masterful puppeteering by good old Russia?
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/02/world/asia/kyrgyzstan-says-united-states-manas-air-base-will-close.html?ref=world
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/02/world/asia/kyrgyzstan-says-united-states-manas-air-base-will-close.html?ref=world
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Well, that's a twist in the abortion debate I wasn't expecting...
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/26/us/politics/personhood-amendments-would-ban-nearly-all-abortions.html?smid=fb-nytimes&WT.mc_id=PO-SM-E-FB-SM-LIN-PPA-102611-NYT-NA&WT.mc_ev=click
So Mississippi...you know- the state with the worst education in the country, lots of poor people and overall not a great place to live (Sorry, but look at the data- it's not very kind). They decided that trying to outlaw abortion was just not enough. So what do they decide to do? Let's pass a constitutional amendment that makes a fertilized egg a human being. Damn. They are not messing around.
So what does that even mean? Well, no abortions...duh. Rape and incest? Nope- absolutely no abortions. Abortion to save the mother's life? Not gonna happen. No "morning after" pills either, you heathens (though they only prevent fertilization from happening...so once it's fertilized they do nothing. But apparently facts don't matter). In vitro fertilization? Kind of gray area.
Pull quote- "Personhood is bigger than just shutting down abortion clinics; it's an opportunity for people to say that we're made in the image of God." You didn't misread that. Separation of church and state anyone?
It's no secret how pro choice I am. Do I like abortion? No, but honestly, who does? Nobody, that's who. I know it's asking a lot, but I just like having control over my body and be able to make choices about it.
It's also interesting to hear about Conservative pro life groups that want nothing to do with this campaign, because of the possible repercussions. Because if this passes, there will be a legal battle and it will be declared unconstitutional- and some pro life groups are afraid higher courts may make a judgment that hurts their movement more so. I'm not a lawyer, so I can't say with 100% certainty that this will be declared unconstitutional; but I'm also not an idiot, so I can say it's pretty damn probable.
I could go on and on...but I'll just end with this- is Mississippi prepared to deal with higher birth rates if this passes? Because if there are no abortions, there will obviously be more babies. That means there's also going to be a higher instance of women having children they can't take of. There's a good chance they will go on Public Assistance. And then be told over and over by the government, the media and many others that she's a lazy, awful human being because she's leeching off the government. If you don't want women having children they can't afford/take care of- then give them options. You know, like fund Planned Parenthood so women can get easier access to contraception and not get pregnant. You can't have it both ways- sorry Mississippi. Go ahead and throw a tantrum. Not like it will make a difference. You're already considered one of, if not the, worst states to live in. Yet, you've somehow found a way to sink to a new low.
So Mississippi...you know- the state with the worst education in the country, lots of poor people and overall not a great place to live (Sorry, but look at the data- it's not very kind). They decided that trying to outlaw abortion was just not enough. So what do they decide to do? Let's pass a constitutional amendment that makes a fertilized egg a human being. Damn. They are not messing around.
So what does that even mean? Well, no abortions...duh. Rape and incest? Nope- absolutely no abortions. Abortion to save the mother's life? Not gonna happen. No "morning after" pills either, you heathens (though they only prevent fertilization from happening...so once it's fertilized they do nothing. But apparently facts don't matter). In vitro fertilization? Kind of gray area.
Pull quote- "Personhood is bigger than just shutting down abortion clinics; it's an opportunity for people to say that we're made in the image of God." You didn't misread that. Separation of church and state anyone?
It's no secret how pro choice I am. Do I like abortion? No, but honestly, who does? Nobody, that's who. I know it's asking a lot, but I just like having control over my body and be able to make choices about it.
It's also interesting to hear about Conservative pro life groups that want nothing to do with this campaign, because of the possible repercussions. Because if this passes, there will be a legal battle and it will be declared unconstitutional- and some pro life groups are afraid higher courts may make a judgment that hurts their movement more so. I'm not a lawyer, so I can't say with 100% certainty that this will be declared unconstitutional; but I'm also not an idiot, so I can say it's pretty damn probable.
I could go on and on...but I'll just end with this- is Mississippi prepared to deal with higher birth rates if this passes? Because if there are no abortions, there will obviously be more babies. That means there's also going to be a higher instance of women having children they can't take of. There's a good chance they will go on Public Assistance. And then be told over and over by the government, the media and many others that she's a lazy, awful human being because she's leeching off the government. If you don't want women having children they can't afford/take care of- then give them options. You know, like fund Planned Parenthood so women can get easier access to contraception and not get pregnant. You can't have it both ways- sorry Mississippi. Go ahead and throw a tantrum. Not like it will make a difference. You're already considered one of, if not the, worst states to live in. Yet, you've somehow found a way to sink to a new low.
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
Gender Equality- Norway
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/25/world/europe/in-norway-gender-equality-does-not-extend-to-the-bedroom.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&ref=world&gwh=F6B8775CEF79CEE11952080D078B8654
I'll admit I was surprised by this article. Maybe I was under the veil of how great Scandinavian countries seem to be at everything. I guess the grass isn't always greener...
I don't know a lot about the law (except how to break it), but doesn't it seem kind of jarring that a country like Norwary- where we applaud them for their liberal views on healthcare, maternity/paternity leave, education- and yet husbands who rape their wives are often acquitted?
I'll admit I was surprised by this article. Maybe I was under the veil of how great Scandinavian countries seem to be at everything. I guess the grass isn't always greener...
I don't know a lot about the law (except how to break it), but doesn't it seem kind of jarring that a country like Norwary- where we applaud them for their liberal views on healthcare, maternity/paternity leave, education- and yet husbands who rape their wives are often acquitted?
Friday, October 21, 2011
Student Debt
http://www.npr.org/2011/10/21/141564239/school-debt-a-long-term-burden-for-many-graduates?sc=fb&cc=fp
As I'll be graduating with my Master's this summer, it's a no brainer that I have student loan debt. I know how much I'll have too- even in undergrad I was always aware of what I was borrowing. I know that's not so for everyone...but it's hard for me to have sympathy for them. I guess what makes me scratch my head is that- why are we only blaming the loan companies? They are not saints by any means, I know- but why aren't people more upset with the colleges/universities? They're the ones who have raised tuition every year by crazy numbers (and yes, I am aware that public universities sometimes don't have a choice when the state continues to cut their budgets) and expected students to take on the burden. And of course we have, because we need an education to get a job and be "functioning" members of society.
But it can't be so easy- we can't just forgive loans. And boy, do I wish it was that easy. Because there are a lot of people with great degrees who are out in the world who don't deserve the debt they have. We need to make a lot of changes- as a society, we need to stop thinking that every person has to go to college. It's not right for everyone. But to get society to stop thinking like this, we need to have more jobs available to folks that don't require a college degree.
We also need to put caps on tuition- when you look at the data, it is scary to look at how tuition rates have changed in even the last 20 years. We need to strengthen programs like AmeriCorps- I loved my experience of giving a year of service to make my country a little better (hmmm...kind of bragging, but you get my point).
Right now, you can only serve 2 terms of service in AmeriCorps and I believe the total amount of loan forgiveness you can get (for the 2 years of service) is a little under $10,000. It's hard to entice grads to AmeriCorps and national service when, after two years of living in destitution and on food stamps, the amount of loan money you get is not much of a dent. Let's forgive more loans- and let people serve more years (you can serve as many years as you want, but you can only get loan money for 2 years).
As far as what to do with changing colleges and loan companies- ideas? I feel like I'm hearing of trends at colleges of hiring more and more administrative jobs...is that necessary? Shouldn't we be focusing on quality profs and students getting a quality education for their $$? There are many schools that are doing just that- and I applaud them.
It's hard to be 18 and realize that within four years you need to declare a major, that will set you on a track that determines the rest of your life. So yes, you will have students who may not pick the most "practical" major- but should they be punished? I know post graduation I changed a lot and it took many years before I realized what I wanted to do. And it wasn't easy- when I was working in schools I knew that I wasn't happy in my job as a para- because I felt like there was so much I wanted to do to make the school better, but couldn't because of my position/status. So I knew that I needed to do something else. I thought about a teaching license- but the sinking ship of education just didn't seem like a good risk to take. So I decided on Library Science- my history and comm background compliments it well and it also incorporates my new found passions for education and information literacy. I would have never known all of that at 18,19 years old. I feel like college has gone away from a time of self discovery combined with education and worldliness into a "I need a degree, what major/path will bring in enough money?"
Makes me sad.
As I'll be graduating with my Master's this summer, it's a no brainer that I have student loan debt. I know how much I'll have too- even in undergrad I was always aware of what I was borrowing. I know that's not so for everyone...but it's hard for me to have sympathy for them. I guess what makes me scratch my head is that- why are we only blaming the loan companies? They are not saints by any means, I know- but why aren't people more upset with the colleges/universities? They're the ones who have raised tuition every year by crazy numbers (and yes, I am aware that public universities sometimes don't have a choice when the state continues to cut their budgets) and expected students to take on the burden. And of course we have, because we need an education to get a job and be "functioning" members of society.
But it can't be so easy- we can't just forgive loans. And boy, do I wish it was that easy. Because there are a lot of people with great degrees who are out in the world who don't deserve the debt they have. We need to make a lot of changes- as a society, we need to stop thinking that every person has to go to college. It's not right for everyone. But to get society to stop thinking like this, we need to have more jobs available to folks that don't require a college degree.
We also need to put caps on tuition- when you look at the data, it is scary to look at how tuition rates have changed in even the last 20 years. We need to strengthen programs like AmeriCorps- I loved my experience of giving a year of service to make my country a little better (hmmm...kind of bragging, but you get my point).
Right now, you can only serve 2 terms of service in AmeriCorps and I believe the total amount of loan forgiveness you can get (for the 2 years of service) is a little under $10,000. It's hard to entice grads to AmeriCorps and national service when, after two years of living in destitution and on food stamps, the amount of loan money you get is not much of a dent. Let's forgive more loans- and let people serve more years (you can serve as many years as you want, but you can only get loan money for 2 years).
As far as what to do with changing colleges and loan companies- ideas? I feel like I'm hearing of trends at colleges of hiring more and more administrative jobs...is that necessary? Shouldn't we be focusing on quality profs and students getting a quality education for their $$? There are many schools that are doing just that- and I applaud them.
It's hard to be 18 and realize that within four years you need to declare a major, that will set you on a track that determines the rest of your life. So yes, you will have students who may not pick the most "practical" major- but should they be punished? I know post graduation I changed a lot and it took many years before I realized what I wanted to do. And it wasn't easy- when I was working in schools I knew that I wasn't happy in my job as a para- because I felt like there was so much I wanted to do to make the school better, but couldn't because of my position/status. So I knew that I needed to do something else. I thought about a teaching license- but the sinking ship of education just didn't seem like a good risk to take. So I decided on Library Science- my history and comm background compliments it well and it also incorporates my new found passions for education and information literacy. I would have never known all of that at 18,19 years old. I feel like college has gone away from a time of self discovery combined with education and worldliness into a "I need a degree, what major/path will bring in enough money?"
Makes me sad.
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
Slideshow time!
http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2011/10/18/science/20111018-pole-1.html?gwh=7B625BD68205EB50EA2105DD92ED2500
Great slideshow of recently discovered photos from a South Pole expedition from 1910-1913. I love me some old photos :)
http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/18/no-place/?ref=world
From the Lens Blog of the NY Times: Fulbright Scholar spends about a year on a small South Pacific island that is slowly sinking and suffering obvious affects from global warming. Oh wait, but that global warming bunk isn't true, eh?
Great slideshow of recently discovered photos from a South Pole expedition from 1910-1913. I love me some old photos :)
http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/18/no-place/?ref=world
From the Lens Blog of the NY Times: Fulbright Scholar spends about a year on a small South Pacific island that is slowly sinking and suffering obvious affects from global warming. Oh wait, but that global warming bunk isn't true, eh?
Tuesday, October 18, 2011
NPR Bias? Or is it all in our heads?
http://www.npr.org/blogs/ombudsman/2011/10/17/141415623/on-murdoch-and-liberal-bias-at-npr?sc=fb&cc=fp
NPR- constantly bombasted for their "liberal bias". It's a fairly well know criticism now with Juan Williams and all that. But how much of it is trumped up? I don't know if I can say. But sometimes I feel like they get blasted for the smallest things. Should they be under a microscope, so to speak, since they get public funds? Probably, to some extent. But when is it too far? I really don't think they went overboard with their coverage of the hacking scandal this past summer- frankly, I got most of my news from the NY Times (surprised?) because they were breaking news faster than NPR. And it was facts, not opinion. People were hacked by employees of NewsCorp. It hasn't been proved yet how much Murdoch and his son knew. I personally think the son knew a lot more than he's letting on- and I think Murdoch knew as well. But those aren't facts, just my opinion.
I liked that this article broke down their stories that were ran compared to other news outlets- when you look at it that way, it doesn't seem any more than, say, The Wall Street Journal. So what's the good word? NPR bias? Let's hear it!
NPR- constantly bombasted for their "liberal bias". It's a fairly well know criticism now with Juan Williams and all that. But how much of it is trumped up? I don't know if I can say. But sometimes I feel like they get blasted for the smallest things. Should they be under a microscope, so to speak, since they get public funds? Probably, to some extent. But when is it too far? I really don't think they went overboard with their coverage of the hacking scandal this past summer- frankly, I got most of my news from the NY Times (surprised?) because they were breaking news faster than NPR. And it was facts, not opinion. People were hacked by employees of NewsCorp. It hasn't been proved yet how much Murdoch and his son knew. I personally think the son knew a lot more than he's letting on- and I think Murdoch knew as well. But those aren't facts, just my opinion.
I liked that this article broke down their stories that were ran compared to other news outlets- when you look at it that way, it doesn't seem any more than, say, The Wall Street Journal. So what's the good word? NPR bias? Let's hear it!
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
Drug Tests for Welfare?
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/11/us/states-adding-drug-test-as-hurdle-for-welfare.html?pagewanted=1&hp
This is an interesting issue that has really picked up speed over the past couple of years. It's so complex, I find it hard to be able to definitively choose a side.
To break it down:
Our welfare system needs reforming. There are many people that abuse the system. But there are also even more people who do not. Of course no one wants welfare money being used for things it's not supposed to be used for. But is drug testing the way to go? As someone who was on Food Stamps for a while (back in my AmeriCorps days)- it already felt degrading enough when I finally realized that I couldn't survive on the Monopoly money I was paid and needed to get assistance. It was a process where you are made to feel like a bad person and given no sympathy. Is this how we should be treating people? It almost feels like we're kicking people when they're at their lowest.
I guess my question is- is there a better way?
I think back to "Bowling for Columbine"- you don't have to be a Michael Moore fan (I'm on the fence) but the movie does touch on the subject of Welfare to Work, which only let welfare recipients get assistance for so long and then forced them to get minimum wage jobs to cover it. In theory and on paper, this looks good. People are going and making something of themselves not just leeching off the system. But who will raise their kids? That responsibility then falls on the school and it seems like a vicious cycle is starting. I'm not saying I'm completely opposed to such a program. I guess if anything, I'm just trying to point out that it's not as black and white as many like to make it seem- will requiring drug tests be the catalyst to social change that we need to reform our welfare programs? I don't know.
This is an interesting issue that has really picked up speed over the past couple of years. It's so complex, I find it hard to be able to definitively choose a side.
To break it down:
Our welfare system needs reforming. There are many people that abuse the system. But there are also even more people who do not. Of course no one wants welfare money being used for things it's not supposed to be used for. But is drug testing the way to go? As someone who was on Food Stamps for a while (back in my AmeriCorps days)- it already felt degrading enough when I finally realized that I couldn't survive on the Monopoly money I was paid and needed to get assistance. It was a process where you are made to feel like a bad person and given no sympathy. Is this how we should be treating people? It almost feels like we're kicking people when they're at their lowest.
I guess my question is- is there a better way?
I think back to "Bowling for Columbine"- you don't have to be a Michael Moore fan (I'm on the fence) but the movie does touch on the subject of Welfare to Work, which only let welfare recipients get assistance for so long and then forced them to get minimum wage jobs to cover it. In theory and on paper, this looks good. People are going and making something of themselves not just leeching off the system. But who will raise their kids? That responsibility then falls on the school and it seems like a vicious cycle is starting. I'm not saying I'm completely opposed to such a program. I guess if anything, I'm just trying to point out that it's not as black and white as many like to make it seem- will requiring drug tests be the catalyst to social change that we need to reform our welfare programs? I don't know.
Monday, October 10, 2011
Review- Ryan Adams "Ashes and Fire"
So Ryan Adams has a new album out tomorrow. You've been able to listen to it for a while (through NPR, his website, etc) so I figured I'd take the time to give it another full listen through and flush out my thoughts/opinions.
I should point out, for those who don't know- I have been a huge Ryan Adams fan since about my senior year of high school- way back in 2001 when Gold came out. But I can't take credit for discovering it on my own- that goes to my friend Nolan, who shared his music with me and will be joining me at the show in Dec- yay! Figured I should put all my biases out there. Love the music...though I'll admit he can be an asshole a lot.
The first track is called "Dirty Rain" and once you hear it, you'll breathe a sigh of relief. Yes, he's back. Whiskeytown, alt country esque Ryan is finally back. He has been making ok albums, but I'd say his last great album was Cold Roses that he did with the Cardinals back in 2005. Superb double album. This song is very bare bones and allows Ryan to showcase his songwriting abilities. The man has a way with words, sometimes so rich with metaphors and imagery and sometimes so raw and uninhibited with literalness (if that isn't a word, it is now- Update: Dictionary.com says it's a word).
What I've always enjoyed about his good albums were how visual they were. Listen to Heartbreaker and I dare you to convince me you didn't once remember back to a bad breakup. Cold Roses is steeped in images of the South, albeit an idolized South. Gold brings images of everything a road trip should be.
It's overall a much slower and somber album. Mandy Moore and Norah Jones lend some lovely background vocals- and trust me, I was very skeptical of what Mandy Moore would be able to contribute, if anything (listen to "Kindness" and your mind will be changed as well). There are some strings used, but sparingly, which I think works well for him. My beef with string arrangements (and as a former violinist, I love them) is that sometimes the string arrangements can overpower the rest of what's going on, but Adams and producer Glyn Johns took the time to make sure that the string arrangements complimented the song and didn't overtake the rest of the music. The echo on "Do I Wait" just makes it sound so lonely, so isolated, so perfect. Especially once the song picks up in the last minute- combine that echo with some great guitar? Yes, please!
The first single for the album is "Lucky Now" and it's a good introduction to the album- simple arrangement, great production quality and classic Ryan lyricism- "Waiting outside while you find your keys, like bags of trash in the blackening snow..." and it seems like a very self reflective song for him. "And the lights will draw you in, and the dark will take you down, and the night will break your heart...I feel like somebody I don't know, am I really who I was?" And let's face it, after Gold, he's had a lot of lows. So it's nice to see him face some of that through song.
So maybe marriage has grounded him? Or the fact that he is clean again and took 2 years off to recover from some ear disorder? Who knows. All I know is that I'm glad he's back- and hopefully to stay.
I should point out, for those who don't know- I have been a huge Ryan Adams fan since about my senior year of high school- way back in 2001 when Gold came out. But I can't take credit for discovering it on my own- that goes to my friend Nolan, who shared his music with me and will be joining me at the show in Dec- yay! Figured I should put all my biases out there. Love the music...though I'll admit he can be an asshole a lot.
The first track is called "Dirty Rain" and once you hear it, you'll breathe a sigh of relief. Yes, he's back. Whiskeytown, alt country esque Ryan is finally back. He has been making ok albums, but I'd say his last great album was Cold Roses that he did with the Cardinals back in 2005. Superb double album. This song is very bare bones and allows Ryan to showcase his songwriting abilities. The man has a way with words, sometimes so rich with metaphors and imagery and sometimes so raw and uninhibited with literalness (if that isn't a word, it is now- Update: Dictionary.com says it's a word).
What I've always enjoyed about his good albums were how visual they were. Listen to Heartbreaker and I dare you to convince me you didn't once remember back to a bad breakup. Cold Roses is steeped in images of the South, albeit an idolized South. Gold brings images of everything a road trip should be.
It's overall a much slower and somber album. Mandy Moore and Norah Jones lend some lovely background vocals- and trust me, I was very skeptical of what Mandy Moore would be able to contribute, if anything (listen to "Kindness" and your mind will be changed as well). There are some strings used, but sparingly, which I think works well for him. My beef with string arrangements (and as a former violinist, I love them) is that sometimes the string arrangements can overpower the rest of what's going on, but Adams and producer Glyn Johns took the time to make sure that the string arrangements complimented the song and didn't overtake the rest of the music. The echo on "Do I Wait" just makes it sound so lonely, so isolated, so perfect. Especially once the song picks up in the last minute- combine that echo with some great guitar? Yes, please!
The first single for the album is "Lucky Now" and it's a good introduction to the album- simple arrangement, great production quality and classic Ryan lyricism- "Waiting outside while you find your keys, like bags of trash in the blackening snow..." and it seems like a very self reflective song for him. "And the lights will draw you in, and the dark will take you down, and the night will break your heart...I feel like somebody I don't know, am I really who I was?" And let's face it, after Gold, he's had a lot of lows. So it's nice to see him face some of that through song.
So maybe marriage has grounded him? Or the fact that he is clean again and took 2 years off to recover from some ear disorder? Who knows. All I know is that I'm glad he's back- and hopefully to stay.
Thursday, October 6, 2011
Baryshnikov Donates to NY Libraries
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/06/arts/dance/baryshnikov-packs-up-his-memories-in-boxes.html?ref=arts
So Baryshnikov recently donated a ton of his personal things to the NY Public Libraries. Still think libraries aren't relavent? Who do you think has to process all of these items, organize them and then make sure they're in proper condition to be presented to the public? Librarians, that's who.
I can't wait until things are digitized and uploaded- even if you know nothing about ballet, he was an amazing dancer and a great advocate for artistic freedom. I'd love to see some of the videos, so see the evolution of him as a dancer.
So Baryshnikov recently donated a ton of his personal things to the NY Public Libraries. Still think libraries aren't relavent? Who do you think has to process all of these items, organize them and then make sure they're in proper condition to be presented to the public? Librarians, that's who.
I can't wait until things are digitized and uploaded- even if you know nothing about ballet, he was an amazing dancer and a great advocate for artistic freedom. I'd love to see some of the videos, so see the evolution of him as a dancer.
Surgery Late in Life
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/06/health/research/06medicare.html?ref=health
While this report (as the article brings up) leaves a lot of questions unanswered- many will agree that there has been an increase in surgeries late in life. And the question arises- were they needed/necessary?
I guess this struck a chord with me because it talks about doctor's performing surgeries to try and fix a problem even when they know that it won't necessarily save the patient's life. That's quite an ethical debate- if a doctor knows someone is dying, do they still perform the surgery? Because when it comes to death, sometimes the family isn't always the best judge- you want to hope that any surgery will save someone's life. We aren't always in the best state of mind.
And as anything that involves medical studies, I think to my own life and inevitably to my dad. I was only 10 when he had his accident and as I've grown older my mom has told us (my sisters and I) that it was very touch and go in the hospital in Michigan. There was no certainty he would survive. And I wonder- what if the doctors had just told my mom that they wouldn't continue to do surgeries because they weren't sure it would save his life? It's why I have immense respect for the medical field- would you want to have those decisions weighing on you? I wouldn't.
Since my dad will be having his first open heart surgery up here in Mpls next Friday, I wonder if and when the doctors may say enough is enough. When I step back, it's quite amazing how my dad has squeaked by. He survived his crash and the multiple surgeries that came with that. When being disabled made him less mobile and more sedentary and he started having problems with clogged arteries, he survived the surgery to have stints put in. When fluid that collected in his fake knee got staph infection, went into his bloodstream and went septic in his body- somehow he survived that too (though that one was the VA's fault for not alerting us that he had staph infection).
Even though it's an old hat for me, I'm always nervous for him. Even though his mortality has been something I've been grappling with for 17 years, it never gets easier. It's interesting- on the one hand, I'm constantly amazed at the strength of the human body and how my dad's body has been so resilient. On the other hand, I would never wish upon my worst enemy the feeling that any sickness could be the last, that every surgery is a life risk.
So I guess, after that giant tangent- I'm left wondering, how do doctor's go about determining when a surgery is necessary or not?
While this report (as the article brings up) leaves a lot of questions unanswered- many will agree that there has been an increase in surgeries late in life. And the question arises- were they needed/necessary?
I guess this struck a chord with me because it talks about doctor's performing surgeries to try and fix a problem even when they know that it won't necessarily save the patient's life. That's quite an ethical debate- if a doctor knows someone is dying, do they still perform the surgery? Because when it comes to death, sometimes the family isn't always the best judge- you want to hope that any surgery will save someone's life. We aren't always in the best state of mind.
And as anything that involves medical studies, I think to my own life and inevitably to my dad. I was only 10 when he had his accident and as I've grown older my mom has told us (my sisters and I) that it was very touch and go in the hospital in Michigan. There was no certainty he would survive. And I wonder- what if the doctors had just told my mom that they wouldn't continue to do surgeries because they weren't sure it would save his life? It's why I have immense respect for the medical field- would you want to have those decisions weighing on you? I wouldn't.
Since my dad will be having his first open heart surgery up here in Mpls next Friday, I wonder if and when the doctors may say enough is enough. When I step back, it's quite amazing how my dad has squeaked by. He survived his crash and the multiple surgeries that came with that. When being disabled made him less mobile and more sedentary and he started having problems with clogged arteries, he survived the surgery to have stints put in. When fluid that collected in his fake knee got staph infection, went into his bloodstream and went septic in his body- somehow he survived that too (though that one was the VA's fault for not alerting us that he had staph infection).
Even though it's an old hat for me, I'm always nervous for him. Even though his mortality has been something I've been grappling with for 17 years, it never gets easier. It's interesting- on the one hand, I'm constantly amazed at the strength of the human body and how my dad's body has been so resilient. On the other hand, I would never wish upon my worst enemy the feeling that any sickness could be the last, that every surgery is a life risk.
So I guess, after that giant tangent- I'm left wondering, how do doctor's go about determining when a surgery is necessary or not?
Wednesday, October 5, 2011
Farmers Strain to Hire Americans
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/05/us/farmers-strain-to-hire-american-workers-in-place-of-migrant-labor.html?_r=1&hp
I found this article interesting because it is somewhat of a head scratcher- there are farmers, willing to pay at least $10.50/hour (which may not seem like much, but if you're unemployed can add up to some extra cash every month) to anyone that wants to work their lands during summers. But they can't find locals and instead have to bring in more migrant workers from Mexico.
This made me remember back to when I was 15 and got my first job working for Dekalb/Monsanto for the summer. We were outside every day (unless it was pouring rain) working 9 hours in lovely Iowa heat and humidity. But since I was a desperate teen in need of cash, it was this or work in a restaurant. Yes- it is hard work. It requires a lot of the same monotone movements, lots of bending, walking, etc. All in all- you exercise. A lot.
So I can understand why some in the story quit the farm work. But a job is a job in my book. And these farmers would love to work with locals instead of migrant workers- but they can't get enough workers. Does this mean people haven't hit rock bottom yet? I'm not sure. But if I was unemployed, any work is better than no work. You don't get to be picky when you've got nothing. I guess some people really need to see the bottom of the barrel before they'll take a job that requires rolling up your sleeves and doing some good old fashioned hard labor.
I found this article interesting because it is somewhat of a head scratcher- there are farmers, willing to pay at least $10.50/hour (which may not seem like much, but if you're unemployed can add up to some extra cash every month) to anyone that wants to work their lands during summers. But they can't find locals and instead have to bring in more migrant workers from Mexico.
This made me remember back to when I was 15 and got my first job working for Dekalb/Monsanto for the summer. We were outside every day (unless it was pouring rain) working 9 hours in lovely Iowa heat and humidity. But since I was a desperate teen in need of cash, it was this or work in a restaurant. Yes- it is hard work. It requires a lot of the same monotone movements, lots of bending, walking, etc. All in all- you exercise. A lot.
So I can understand why some in the story quit the farm work. But a job is a job in my book. And these farmers would love to work with locals instead of migrant workers- but they can't get enough workers. Does this mean people haven't hit rock bottom yet? I'm not sure. But if I was unemployed, any work is better than no work. You don't get to be picky when you've got nothing. I guess some people really need to see the bottom of the barrel before they'll take a job that requires rolling up your sleeves and doing some good old fashioned hard labor.
Tuesday, October 4, 2011
I guess Hank's friends are really rowdy...
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2011/10/03/141027499/espn-pulls-hank-williams-jr-song-from-mnf-over-hitler-remark?sc=fb&cc=fp
So ESPN is pulling Hank Williams, Jr's song from Monday Night Football (no word on whether this is temporary or permanent) because of some remarks made on Fox and Friends.
I do understand where ESPN is coming on this one- they usually try to keep politics out of national sports and after Williams called Obama Hitler they knew they'd alienate a lot of fans. From a marketing/PR standpoint, it made sense.
But I think this problem could have easily been avoided if we stopped thinking that music artists and other celebrities of the like have this great insight on politics. Of course, I understand musicians/other celebrities will make endorsements- that's nothing new. But why would you bring someone on a show and ask for their political insight if they really have no background in politics? What's the point?
It's kind of the double edged sword of the Iowa caucuses. On the one hand, all of the candidates visit a state that would never get a visit otherwise. On the other hand, you also get a bunch of random celebrities who show up to bring numbers in. And as someone who was around for a caucus, it is fun. Hell, it's how I got to meet Stephen Colbert. But when I would see these celebrities (Martin Sheen, Joan Jett, Leo DiCaprio, etc) I never thought they were offering any unique insight, because they had no idea what life was like for ordinary Iowans.
I guess, as you can tell, I'm torn. On the one hand I understand celebrities getting their noses in politics is old news. But on the other hand- it seems like it has gotten worse with the advent of 24 news channels- they need to fill airspace, so they'll take whoever. I mean, why would Hank Williams, Jr be considered someone worthy to talk about the GOP candidates with?
So ESPN is pulling Hank Williams, Jr's song from Monday Night Football (no word on whether this is temporary or permanent) because of some remarks made on Fox and Friends.
I do understand where ESPN is coming on this one- they usually try to keep politics out of national sports and after Williams called Obama Hitler they knew they'd alienate a lot of fans. From a marketing/PR standpoint, it made sense.
But I think this problem could have easily been avoided if we stopped thinking that music artists and other celebrities of the like have this great insight on politics. Of course, I understand musicians/other celebrities will make endorsements- that's nothing new. But why would you bring someone on a show and ask for their political insight if they really have no background in politics? What's the point?
It's kind of the double edged sword of the Iowa caucuses. On the one hand, all of the candidates visit a state that would never get a visit otherwise. On the other hand, you also get a bunch of random celebrities who show up to bring numbers in. And as someone who was around for a caucus, it is fun. Hell, it's how I got to meet Stephen Colbert. But when I would see these celebrities (Martin Sheen, Joan Jett, Leo DiCaprio, etc) I never thought they were offering any unique insight, because they had no idea what life was like for ordinary Iowans.
I guess, as you can tell, I'm torn. On the one hand I understand celebrities getting their noses in politics is old news. But on the other hand- it seems like it has gotten worse with the advent of 24 news channels- they need to fill airspace, so they'll take whoever. I mean, why would Hank Williams, Jr be considered someone worthy to talk about the GOP candidates with?
Monday, October 3, 2011
Changes to GI Bill
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/03/opinion/a-broader-gi-bill.html?_r=1&hp
I'll admit that I obviously have a bias towards this subject, since I am the daughter of a Vet. My dad did not use the GI Bill for education though. But it was interesting to learn how much money from the GI Bill was being used towards for profit institutions and a decent percentage were never graduating.
There has been news in the past few months regarding the shadiness of for profit colleges. I'd suggest looking into that if you're a novice on the subject.
I'll admit that I obviously have a bias towards this subject, since I am the daughter of a Vet. My dad did not use the GI Bill for education though. But it was interesting to learn how much money from the GI Bill was being used towards for profit institutions and a decent percentage were never graduating.
There has been news in the past few months regarding the shadiness of for profit colleges. I'd suggest looking into that if you're a novice on the subject.
Thailand- be nice to the king and don't even think about purchasing "The King and I"
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/03/world/asia/03iht-thailand03.html?pagewanted=1&ref=world
Thailand is quite the interesting country. I could go on and on about the beauty, but if you want more on that, go there for yourself. But man, do they love their King. Forget the British Royals- the Thais have an internest task force whose only job is to block or shut down websites (and arrest those that published them, if they can find them) that in any way speak badly of the Thai Royal Family. It's pretty hardcore.
Also, fun fact- it is illegal in Thailand to have a copy of The King and I.
Thailand is quite the interesting country. I could go on and on about the beauty, but if you want more on that, go there for yourself. But man, do they love their King. Forget the British Royals- the Thais have an internest task force whose only job is to block or shut down websites (and arrest those that published them, if they can find them) that in any way speak badly of the Thai Royal Family. It's pretty hardcore.
Also, fun fact- it is illegal in Thailand to have a copy of The King and I.
Weekend Wrap Up
There was a lot of news over the weekend...but in classic me fashion, I tend to not be plugged in on the weekends as much. So this may be your chance to school me- share a link of an interesting weekend story. You get the satisfaction of knowing that you are obviously superior to me when it comes to weekend news.
Sidenote to Sara Neppl- Hanson was in town playing on Sunday and I thought of you.
So if I wasn't plugged into the world, then what the hell was I up to? I spent about 2 hours Saturday morning waiting in line for Ryan Adams tickets (and made out quite well if I do say so myself). Sat night was dedicated to bonfire/friends/The Big Lebowski/sleepover/morning quiche!
Sunday I did get some media time in- I watched the Vikings suck once again and watched Ken Burns Prohibition.
Sidenote to Sara Neppl- Hanson was in town playing on Sunday and I thought of you.
So if I wasn't plugged into the world, then what the hell was I up to? I spent about 2 hours Saturday morning waiting in line for Ryan Adams tickets (and made out quite well if I do say so myself). Sat night was dedicated to bonfire/friends/The Big Lebowski/sleepover/morning quiche!
Sunday I did get some media time in- I watched the Vikings suck once again and watched Ken Burns Prohibition.
Thursday, September 29, 2011
A Call for Opening up Web Access at Schools
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/29/education/29banned.html?ref=technology&gwh=9A1C99433BBA11693936524036D4192A
Did you know it was Banned Books Week? No? It's ok, I forgive you. This year many schools and libraries are also analyzing censorship and schools and...wait for it- the Internet. If you haven't been in a school for a while, let me catch you up. With all the filters- you can't go anywhere. You think you're work filter is bad? School filters are worse.
And it brings up an interesting debate- should schools be filtering so much? Should they be allowed to block social media? With the onset of cyber bullying, I can understand that schools don't want to have any part (or liability) in such situations. But social media can also be a useful tool in the classroom. And what better place to use it as a teaching opportunity to discern between good, useful information and the rest of the crap that's out there.
I'll admit I'm torn on this issue. I think that anymore filtering is almost becoming pointless since many students can still access the information outside of school. And once you start blocking things, it can be a slippery slope. But on the other- schools are supposed to be a safe haven, and while that's not always true should we abandon that goal?
Thoughts? Do you think this is a free speech issue? Do you think we should loosen the filters at schools?
Did you know it was Banned Books Week? No? It's ok, I forgive you. This year many schools and libraries are also analyzing censorship and schools and...wait for it- the Internet. If you haven't been in a school for a while, let me catch you up. With all the filters- you can't go anywhere. You think you're work filter is bad? School filters are worse.
And it brings up an interesting debate- should schools be filtering so much? Should they be allowed to block social media? With the onset of cyber bullying, I can understand that schools don't want to have any part (or liability) in such situations. But social media can also be a useful tool in the classroom. And what better place to use it as a teaching opportunity to discern between good, useful information and the rest of the crap that's out there.
I'll admit I'm torn on this issue. I think that anymore filtering is almost becoming pointless since many students can still access the information outside of school. And once you start blocking things, it can be a slippery slope. But on the other- schools are supposed to be a safe haven, and while that's not always true should we abandon that goal?
Thoughts? Do you think this is a free speech issue? Do you think we should loosen the filters at schools?
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Plug for Neil LaBute
http://www.guthrietheater.org/whats_happening/shows/2011/reasons_be_pretty
So this a plug for a play I'd like to see, but probably won't get the chance to. Silly grad school, eating up my time...
If you don't know Neil LaBute- he's a great modern playwright. Reasons to be pretty is the end of a trilogy that includes The Shape of Things and Fat Pig- and they discuss America's obsession with surface beauty.
I have not seen Fat Pig, but have seen The Shape of Things (it was also made into a movie with Paul Rudd and Rachel Weisz- good, but the play flows better). His commentary on our obsession with all things shallow is quite good. And his plays aren't fluff- the characters aren't always likable and they ask tough questions- such as what are the lengths people will go to for acceptance? If somethings makes you better/more acceptable in the eyes of society, does how you get there matter? A little Machiavellian, but still good questions worth considering.
So if you go see the play (it's currently playing at the Guthrie), share your thoughts!
So this a plug for a play I'd like to see, but probably won't get the chance to. Silly grad school, eating up my time...
If you don't know Neil LaBute- he's a great modern playwright. Reasons to be pretty is the end of a trilogy that includes The Shape of Things and Fat Pig- and they discuss America's obsession with surface beauty.
I have not seen Fat Pig, but have seen The Shape of Things (it was also made into a movie with Paul Rudd and Rachel Weisz- good, but the play flows better). His commentary on our obsession with all things shallow is quite good. And his plays aren't fluff- the characters aren't always likable and they ask tough questions- such as what are the lengths people will go to for acceptance? If somethings makes you better/more acceptable in the eyes of society, does how you get there matter? A little Machiavellian, but still good questions worth considering.
So if you go see the play (it's currently playing at the Guthrie), share your thoughts!
Anoka Hennepin- still neutral
http://blogs.citypages.com/blotter/2011/09/anoka-hennepin_teacher_training_test_requires_affirmation_of_neutrality_policy.php
So Anoka Hennepin is still sticking by their neutrality policy. The Dept of Justice is still investigating and instead of deciding that they've got a policy that does nothing about combating bullying or homophobia- Anoka Hennepin is just doing more teacher training. The article lists a couple of examples of a quiz that teachers were required to take after completing mandatory training. Such as "One of the goals of the sexual orientation curriculum policy is to ensure all of our students feel safe and respected in our classrooms and/or while participating in school activities: true or false?"
Wow. Just wow. I'll admit I'm very surprised to see a question like this in this day and age- seems like a question that would be asked many decades ago, back when homosexuality was still a crime in most states.
All teachers are required to take the quiz, and can retake it as many times as needed to pass (which pretty much makes it pointless). So it seems to me (and some of the teachers) that the only reason they're doing this training and quiz is so they can push back against criticisms with- look at this training and quiz, our teachers think the policy works just fine.
So if we don't talk about sexual orientation- do they think it will just go away? These kids are around different ideas regarding sexual orientation all the time. They look to their elders- teachers, parents, etc- to help them form opinions on the world around them and that includes sexual orientation. So instead of having teachers be able to discuss the issue and let students debate in a safe environment, they're creating a chaos where teachers feel helpless and many students are bullied and victimized.
And it goes beyond the policy- they're handling of bullying needs to change as well, regardless of sexual orientation. One of the students in the lawsuit from Southern Poverty Law Center remembers that when he complained of being bullied in the locker room for gym, instead of confronting the issue with students, told the student that he could just change for gym in the nurse's office. Because that will stop the bullying.
Anoka Hennepin- when will you acknowledge the elephant in the room?
So Anoka Hennepin is still sticking by their neutrality policy. The Dept of Justice is still investigating and instead of deciding that they've got a policy that does nothing about combating bullying or homophobia- Anoka Hennepin is just doing more teacher training. The article lists a couple of examples of a quiz that teachers were required to take after completing mandatory training. Such as "One of the goals of the sexual orientation curriculum policy is to ensure all of our students feel safe and respected in our classrooms and/or while participating in school activities: true or false?"
Wow. Just wow. I'll admit I'm very surprised to see a question like this in this day and age- seems like a question that would be asked many decades ago, back when homosexuality was still a crime in most states.
All teachers are required to take the quiz, and can retake it as many times as needed to pass (which pretty much makes it pointless). So it seems to me (and some of the teachers) that the only reason they're doing this training and quiz is so they can push back against criticisms with- look at this training and quiz, our teachers think the policy works just fine.
So if we don't talk about sexual orientation- do they think it will just go away? These kids are around different ideas regarding sexual orientation all the time. They look to their elders- teachers, parents, etc- to help them form opinions on the world around them and that includes sexual orientation. So instead of having teachers be able to discuss the issue and let students debate in a safe environment, they're creating a chaos where teachers feel helpless and many students are bullied and victimized.
And it goes beyond the policy- they're handling of bullying needs to change as well, regardless of sexual orientation. One of the students in the lawsuit from Southern Poverty Law Center remembers that when he complained of being bullied in the locker room for gym, instead of confronting the issue with students, told the student that he could just change for gym in the nurse's office. Because that will stop the bullying.
Anoka Hennepin- when will you acknowledge the elephant in the room?
First Listen- Feist, "Metals"
http://www.listentofeist.com
You can stream the new Feist album if you give them your email. They already had mine, so I obliged of course. I have been a Feist fan since Let It Die came out in '04. No, promise I'm not trying to flaunt my indie cred (do I have indie cred? I say no, but I suppose that is a term that is usually bestowed upon one by others...)- but I think you can appreciate her as an artist differently than if you first knew her from The Reminder. This new album reminds me more of Let It Die (less covers though) in its simplicity. There isn't really a super upbeat song. It is very much of the season- this would not be a summer album. It fits perfectly into being released in early October as the seasons change- it flows well from one song to the next, very contemplative and I can easily imagine this playing in the background while driving and enjoying fall colors. Also seems like more of a night time album- something I would listen to before sleeping or on a late night/early morning.
Upon first listen, the 2 tracks that stood out to me were "Undiscovered First" and "Cicadas and Gulls". One follows the other, and when listening I envision a lot of deep colors- purples, oranges, reds, much like a good sunrise on a brisk fall morning. And I think that suits Feist's voice quite well- I'll admit that while I enjoyed The Reminder, some songs just didn't sit right with me. It was experimental, which I always applaud of artists and in many ways it was successful. This album just seems more comfortable, like she isn't trying so hard, she's just doing what comes natural.
And when it comes down to it, it is very steeped in nature. I don't always have visions of very specific things when I listen to an album, but upon first listen I do in this case. I can listen to this and imagine walking among fall leaves, imagine the crunching noise. I can imagine frost and first snowfall. I'm not sure if this is necessarily a good thing or not since it may pigeonhole the album, but I like it.
I've only seen Feist once in concert at The Maintenence Shop in Ames on the IA State campus in 2005- her voice sounds just as good live and I would highly recommend seeing her. I feel her catalog, now with this new album, will be varied enough to really put on a great show.
I'd love to hear your thoughts on the new album- or criticisms?
You can stream the new Feist album if you give them your email. They already had mine, so I obliged of course. I have been a Feist fan since Let It Die came out in '04. No, promise I'm not trying to flaunt my indie cred (do I have indie cred? I say no, but I suppose that is a term that is usually bestowed upon one by others...)- but I think you can appreciate her as an artist differently than if you first knew her from The Reminder. This new album reminds me more of Let It Die (less covers though) in its simplicity. There isn't really a super upbeat song. It is very much of the season- this would not be a summer album. It fits perfectly into being released in early October as the seasons change- it flows well from one song to the next, very contemplative and I can easily imagine this playing in the background while driving and enjoying fall colors. Also seems like more of a night time album- something I would listen to before sleeping or on a late night/early morning.
Upon first listen, the 2 tracks that stood out to me were "Undiscovered First" and "Cicadas and Gulls". One follows the other, and when listening I envision a lot of deep colors- purples, oranges, reds, much like a good sunrise on a brisk fall morning. And I think that suits Feist's voice quite well- I'll admit that while I enjoyed The Reminder, some songs just didn't sit right with me. It was experimental, which I always applaud of artists and in many ways it was successful. This album just seems more comfortable, like she isn't trying so hard, she's just doing what comes natural.
And when it comes down to it, it is very steeped in nature. I don't always have visions of very specific things when I listen to an album, but upon first listen I do in this case. I can listen to this and imagine walking among fall leaves, imagine the crunching noise. I can imagine frost and first snowfall. I'm not sure if this is necessarily a good thing or not since it may pigeonhole the album, but I like it.
I've only seen Feist once in concert at The Maintenence Shop in Ames on the IA State campus in 2005- her voice sounds just as good live and I would highly recommend seeing her. I feel her catalog, now with this new album, will be varied enough to really put on a great show.
I'd love to hear your thoughts on the new album- or criticisms?
Thursday, September 22, 2011
Obama, Israel and Palestine- What Now?
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/22/world/obama-rebuffed-as-palestinians-pursue-un-seat.html?ref=world&gwh=44710E784E0BC9D126ACD1D2C226CFF9
So while the hikers were finally getting to come home from Iran (and it's about damn time!), Obama was try to dance around the issue facing the UN- Palestine is trying to join the UN, thus getting recognition that they are their own autonomous country. Kind of like Kosovo. Speaking of Kosovo...whatever happened with that? I'll have to research that later.
If you'll think back, there was a time where Obama supported Palestine in this struggle. Yesterday he said they were going about it wrong, and should instead get their autonomy through negotiations with Israel. Could it be because he really thinks this avenue is better? Could it be because he's afraid of losing pro-Israel votes (which tend to vote Democrat) to the Republicans? I'm not sure. I don't want to call it back pedaling per se...but since when have negotiations between Israel and Palestine actually solved anything?
So while the hikers were finally getting to come home from Iran (and it's about damn time!), Obama was try to dance around the issue facing the UN- Palestine is trying to join the UN, thus getting recognition that they are their own autonomous country. Kind of like Kosovo. Speaking of Kosovo...whatever happened with that? I'll have to research that later.
If you'll think back, there was a time where Obama supported Palestine in this struggle. Yesterday he said they were going about it wrong, and should instead get their autonomy through negotiations with Israel. Could it be because he really thinks this avenue is better? Could it be because he's afraid of losing pro-Israel votes (which tend to vote Democrat) to the Republicans? I'm not sure. I don't want to call it back pedaling per se...but since when have negotiations between Israel and Palestine actually solved anything?
MN Love
http://blogs.citypages.com/gimmenoise/2011/09/50_minnesota_music_facts.php
So City Pages, the local alt weekly, has been releasing these blog posts of 50 things to love about Minnesota. Yesterday it was 50 things to love about Minnesota food, today it's music. And as a music junkie (it totally fits under the info junkie umbrella) and a lover of lists- please peruse and learn something new.
I know I learned a lot I didn't previously know. Like the fact that Tiny Tim died in Minneapolis and is buried in Lakewood cemetery (which on a morbid note- is a pretty cool cemetery, I'd suggest exploring it sometime if you get the chance).
It just reaffirms my love for Minneapolis- When I was finishing college, I knew I'd either get stuck in one of 3 scenarios- dead end small town small time job, OK job in Des Moines or Iowa city or moving somewhere I enjoyed and making it work. Thankfully I found an AmeriCorps program to die for in Minneapolis and that gave me the opportunity to move up here. When had my choice of Midwest cities (wanted to stay somewhat close to the fam)- Omaha? Nah. Didn't know a lot about the music scene of Kansas city or St. Louis. Chicago? That lifestyle is not my scene- good for visits, not for living. Minneapolis had great music and plenty of outdoorsy stuff for me to do. Let's just call it a great match :)
I always have Iowa- it's my history and I'll never stop loving it. something about that hilly land that goes on forever- you can't beat it. But I don't think I'd ever appreciate it if I'd never left. I'm sure I'm not the only one with that feeling, right?
Also- I would be completely in favor with Atmosphere's "Say Shhh" becoming the official Minneapolis song.
Wednesday, September 21, 2011
Seed Banks
http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2011/09/20/seed-exchange-gardens/
1) Seed banks are cool. Kind of like archives of nature.
2) It makes me think of the Pavlovsk Seed Bank in St. Petersburg, Russia. Did you know that it survived the siege of Leningrad in WWII because scientists moved the specimans and starved to death instead of eating them? It was started by Nikolai Vavilov, who has a very interesting personal history...well until he died in one of Stalin's gulags. But he was kind of the Indiana Jones of the plant world, travelling everywhere to build one of the greatest/largest seed banks in the world.
1) Seed banks are cool. Kind of like archives of nature.
2) It makes me think of the Pavlovsk Seed Bank in St. Petersburg, Russia. Did you know that it survived the siege of Leningrad in WWII because scientists moved the specimans and starved to death instead of eating them? It was started by Nikolai Vavilov, who has a very interesting personal history...well until he died in one of Stalin's gulags. But he was kind of the Indiana Jones of the plant world, travelling everywhere to build one of the greatest/largest seed banks in the world.
Graffiti/Street Art
http://www.citypages.com/2011-09-21/arts/minneapolis-graffiti-artists-create-art-above-the-law/
With the popularity of Banksy and numerous street/public art projects, it's an interesting evolution. I know personally I've seen some great graffiti all over Mpls. Yes, there are some amazing murals that the city commissioned, but for the Mpls natives, if you want to see some great graffiti art, look no further than the Midtown Greenway trail. Makes my bike ride all the better to see good graffiti- meaning something where I know it's more than just a small tag, something that took time and skill. Example, if you take the Midtown Greenway towards the Mississippi River you'll see some great art, much better than say, whoever spray paints "Hammertime" on a bunch of the stop signs in my neighborhood. I know, I know- it's illegal. But I still enjoy it. Maybe it's the whole drama of it all- that someone is defying the law to make something beautiful.
Also the article talks about other forms of public art, like yarn bombing. Anyone in Uptown remember the "Hot Tea" that kept sprouting up? If you ever get the chance to talk to Eric Rieger, the guy behind it, do so. He's pretty cool.
My only wish is that I was more knowledgeable of the different street art/artists here in Minneapolis- I kind of aspire to be like my friend Sara Neppl, who is quite the connoisseur of Seattle street art.
With the popularity of Banksy and numerous street/public art projects, it's an interesting evolution. I know personally I've seen some great graffiti all over Mpls. Yes, there are some amazing murals that the city commissioned, but for the Mpls natives, if you want to see some great graffiti art, look no further than the Midtown Greenway trail. Makes my bike ride all the better to see good graffiti- meaning something where I know it's more than just a small tag, something that took time and skill. Example, if you take the Midtown Greenway towards the Mississippi River you'll see some great art, much better than say, whoever spray paints "Hammertime" on a bunch of the stop signs in my neighborhood. I know, I know- it's illegal. But I still enjoy it. Maybe it's the whole drama of it all- that someone is defying the law to make something beautiful.
Also the article talks about other forms of public art, like yarn bombing. Anyone in Uptown remember the "Hot Tea" that kept sprouting up? If you ever get the chance to talk to Eric Rieger, the guy behind it, do so. He's pretty cool.
My only wish is that I was more knowledgeable of the different street art/artists here in Minneapolis- I kind of aspire to be like my friend Sara Neppl, who is quite the connoisseur of Seattle street art.
Is the US producing too many librarians?
http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2011/is-the-united-states-training-too-many-librarians-or-too-few-part-1/
There are a lot of stats in this article, so feel free to just skim over those (because since you're probably not a librarian or have no plans to be one, they probably don't matter much to you). But what I like about this article is that it points out that the few stats out there related to MLIS programs and the prospects for librarians in the job market tend to not be very good. So while library school is seen as a better risk than, say, law school- in the economy today, people want to know what their prospects are.
I think what is helpful for an MLIS is that you can work in a library with the degree. You can also work for private companies, hospitals, non profits, etc in many different kinds of jobs. Huge companies have their own internal libraries or databases, and MLIS grads can do that also. That's a big gap the stats are missing- there has been tracking of how many library openings there are, but there is no tracking of more "non traditional" job roles that MLIS grads take on.
So the article doesn't give a definite answer to the question- but since I'll be graduating next summer, it's definitely some food for thought for me.
There are a lot of stats in this article, so feel free to just skim over those (because since you're probably not a librarian or have no plans to be one, they probably don't matter much to you). But what I like about this article is that it points out that the few stats out there related to MLIS programs and the prospects for librarians in the job market tend to not be very good. So while library school is seen as a better risk than, say, law school- in the economy today, people want to know what their prospects are.
I think what is helpful for an MLIS is that you can work in a library with the degree. You can also work for private companies, hospitals, non profits, etc in many different kinds of jobs. Huge companies have their own internal libraries or databases, and MLIS grads can do that also. That's a big gap the stats are missing- there has been tracking of how many library openings there are, but there is no tracking of more "non traditional" job roles that MLIS grads take on.
So the article doesn't give a definite answer to the question- but since I'll be graduating next summer, it's definitely some food for thought for me.
Al Jazeera Changin' It Up
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/21/world/middleeast/after-disclosures-by-wikileaks-al-jazeera-replaces-its-top-news-director.html?ref=world&gwh=938D82C17B495DABC5E0678A967A5AD2
So Al Jazeera isn't immune to the sting of Wikileaks either. Now, I'm not involved in the journalistic world (nor do I want to be anymore), but my perception as someone who likes to keep up with the issues involving the evolving media (or maybe devolving?) was that Al Jazeera was pretty respected. After reading this, I suppose we can just lump them in with the rest of the junk.
So Al Jazeera isn't immune to the sting of Wikileaks either. Now, I'm not involved in the journalistic world (nor do I want to be anymore), but my perception as someone who likes to keep up with the issues involving the evolving media (or maybe devolving?) was that Al Jazeera was pretty respected. After reading this, I suppose we can just lump them in with the rest of the junk.
Tuesday, September 20, 2011
Sorry for the lack of posting today. All the more reason to go read the news yourself, you leeches! My boss flew in from WI to have her yearly review and do my yearly review. We're both way too much alike- who else gets sentimental and teary eyed during a year end work review? So the good vibes were all around, plus a raise. And free lunch. Score!
The only topic that is crossing my mind today involves marketing and public relations. We're talking in my public libraries class about the need for libraries to do more marketing and not just public relations. What I'm wondering is this- what would be the difference look like for a library between PR plan and a marketing plan? I'm not sure...thoughts?
The only topic that is crossing my mind today involves marketing and public relations. We're talking in my public libraries class about the need for libraries to do more marketing and not just public relations. What I'm wondering is this- what would be the difference look like for a library between PR plan and a marketing plan? I'm not sure...thoughts?
Monday, September 19, 2011
Alright Obama...don't let me down
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/us/politics/obama-vows-veto-if-deficit-plan-has-no-tax-increases.html?hp&gwh=0A24A91B1B4807FFA5BC85AB44BCBA14
Obama officially announced his plan to cut the deficit by almost $4 trillion. Considering the mess that was raising the debt ceiling- I can only imagine how ugly this will get. Well, at least Colbert and Stewart will have plenty of material to work with.
I just don't understand how GOP lawmakers keep trying to say that by raising taxes, Obama is trying to incite class warfare. Please, someone explain to me how raising taxes so that those who make $1 million or more are paying a fair percentage, much like the middle class (well, what's left of it. It's disappearing so quickly). I would love to hear the other side- because all I get is little bits. I want to know how solely making cuts will help- yes, big cuts need to be made. I don't think anyone is arguing that point. But to close corporate tax loopholes and tax cuts for the wealthy? Isn't this the sacrifice we have to make during such hard times- what these politicians keep talking about?
While the optimist in me would like to believe that something good may come out of this and that for once Obama won't concede to the bully tactics, but the realist in me figures it will end as usual. This would be one case where I would love to be proven wrong.
Obama officially announced his plan to cut the deficit by almost $4 trillion. Considering the mess that was raising the debt ceiling- I can only imagine how ugly this will get. Well, at least Colbert and Stewart will have plenty of material to work with.
I just don't understand how GOP lawmakers keep trying to say that by raising taxes, Obama is trying to incite class warfare. Please, someone explain to me how raising taxes so that those who make $1 million or more are paying a fair percentage, much like the middle class (well, what's left of it. It's disappearing so quickly). I would love to hear the other side- because all I get is little bits. I want to know how solely making cuts will help- yes, big cuts need to be made. I don't think anyone is arguing that point. But to close corporate tax loopholes and tax cuts for the wealthy? Isn't this the sacrifice we have to make during such hard times- what these politicians keep talking about?
While the optimist in me would like to believe that something good may come out of this and that for once Obama won't concede to the bully tactics, but the realist in me figures it will end as usual. This would be one case where I would love to be proven wrong.
Retiree Benefits for the Military Could Face Cuts
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/19/us/retiree-benefits-for-the-military-could-face-cuts.html?pagewanted=1&hp&gwh=E1674D48D3A54A80544324006AB33462
This article talks about how it's pretty inevitable that military pensions/retirement benefits will probably face cuts. Why the big deal, you ask? Because this never happens- there's usually such an uproar (and there will be, just wait) that it becomes political suicide to support anything to cuts benefits to military personnel.
The one question that crossed my mind while reading this was whether this affects the VA system, or is that its own entity? I think it is- because the VA is for any veteran, you don't have to have served x amount of years to be able to use the VA healthcare system.
What do you think? Should we cut military pensions? On the one hand, most of their costs have no been adjusted for inflation (so they're paying about $450.00 for healthcare- per year)- but on the other, these are people who have risked their lives for their country.
This article talks about how it's pretty inevitable that military pensions/retirement benefits will probably face cuts. Why the big deal, you ask? Because this never happens- there's usually such an uproar (and there will be, just wait) that it becomes political suicide to support anything to cuts benefits to military personnel.
The one question that crossed my mind while reading this was whether this affects the VA system, or is that its own entity? I think it is- because the VA is for any veteran, you don't have to have served x amount of years to be able to use the VA healthcare system.
What do you think? Should we cut military pensions? On the one hand, most of their costs have no been adjusted for inflation (so they're paying about $450.00 for healthcare- per year)- but on the other, these are people who have risked their lives for their country.
Sunday, September 18, 2011
My take on the movie "Drive"
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/18/movies/ryan-gosling-and-ides-of-march.html?_r=1&ref=movies
So Saturday we went to see a matinee showing of "Drive." The original plan was to see "Contagion", but because we'd read such good things about "Drive" (and I was promised there would be a shirtless Ryan Gosling- sadly, no dice) we decided to check it out. I had briefly glanced over the NY Times review (the article I linked to is more about Ryan Gosling coming into his own), but the bf raved and since he's the movie buff I wish I could be, I obliged.
There's violence. And while I hate blood and guts and gore for the shock value of it- not the case in this movie. It was so artistic and some scenes with heavy violence had such a great combination of superb cinematography and scoring that it seemed almost operatic, despite the fact that the movie involves the mob.
My big beef with action movies (I would not call this an action movie, but if you see some of the trailers, you could think that) is that most of the time they don't make sense- Drive blew me away with how methodical everything was- everything made sense (does that make sense?), seemed well thought out.
Ryan Gosling was amazing in this movie- I honestly didn't know he had it in him. There isn't much dialogue in this movie- yet his character speaks volumes. He gave a character, who was unable to form any connections in life, so much depth.
The first sequence in the movie was so beautiful and well done- and though I hate to sound like a broken record- so well thought out.
There's also a great supporting cast- big props will go to Albert Brooks. I won't say why- but I will say that he will blow you away in his role.
Friday, September 16, 2011
Get some balls, Obama
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/16/opinion/bipartisanship-of-the-wrong-kind.html?_r=1&hp
It's funny to hear mention of LBJ in this editorial. Because if anyone knew how to wield his power to scare his party into falling in line, it was him. Pretty sure I've never met the guy, he's long dead and he still intimidates me. From beyond the grave. Talk about power. Now, if Obama could just get a tiny bit of that swagger of LBJ and get the Dems in line to fight the GOP.
We're not going to save the economy or create jobs by solely cutting spending. Please, someone, explain to me how less government will create more jobs. If I'm missing something, I'd love to hear it. Obama's plan will create *at least* 1 million jobs. Anyone else shopping around a plan that does so. And every public opinion poll says raise taxes on the rich (and get rid of those damn corporate loopholes!)- so instead of worrying about who will line your pockets next election, why don't you actually represent your constituents!
*Steps down off the soapbox*
It's funny to hear mention of LBJ in this editorial. Because if anyone knew how to wield his power to scare his party into falling in line, it was him. Pretty sure I've never met the guy, he's long dead and he still intimidates me. From beyond the grave. Talk about power. Now, if Obama could just get a tiny bit of that swagger of LBJ and get the Dems in line to fight the GOP.
We're not going to save the economy or create jobs by solely cutting spending. Please, someone, explain to me how less government will create more jobs. If I'm missing something, I'd love to hear it. Obama's plan will create *at least* 1 million jobs. Anyone else shopping around a plan that does so. And every public opinion poll says raise taxes on the rich (and get rid of those damn corporate loopholes!)- so instead of worrying about who will line your pockets next election, why don't you actually represent your constituents!
*Steps down off the soapbox*
Thursday, September 15, 2011
The Poor are Getting Poorer-is anyone surprised by this?
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/us/poor-are-still-getting-poorer-but-downturns-punch-varies-census-data-show.html?_r=1&hp&gwh=7AC8B092C81F02F2C0C5EFC9A015549D
So the Census proves what most people with a pulse already knew- it sucks right now. Especially if you're poor. And if you live in the Midwest. Oh, and if you're young- it sucks to be you too. Mostly because old people aren't as affected by the job shortages. And they don't have a bazillion dollars in student loan debt.
This story is pretty much a big old facts downer about who is getting the short end of the stick. Want something fun to do? See how many of the demographics they mention you fall into? Me, not too many- just living in the Midwest and being young. The news today is making me extra snarky. Snark and anger- it's what I'm full of today. And oatmeal.
So the Census proves what most people with a pulse already knew- it sucks right now. Especially if you're poor. And if you live in the Midwest. Oh, and if you're young- it sucks to be you too. Mostly because old people aren't as affected by the job shortages. And they don't have a bazillion dollars in student loan debt.
This story is pretty much a big old facts downer about who is getting the short end of the stick. Want something fun to do? See how many of the demographics they mention you fall into? Me, not too many- just living in the Midwest and being young. The news today is making me extra snarky. Snark and anger- it's what I'm full of today. And oatmeal.
Interesting things are happening with Twin Cities Journalism...
http://minnesota.publicradio.org/collections/special/columns/music_blog/archive/2011/09/the_currents_mo.shtml
So for those not from Minneapolis or who don't know the story- the lead chef at True Thai (an award winning, and IMO the best Thai in Minneapolis) was the victim of a hit and run accident. It was awful- he was either dragged by the vehicle or hit hard enough to be thrown 40 feet before being left to die and where he was hit was mere blocks away from a hospital and emergency room.
To be fair, I will point out that I do have some bias (but who doesn't?)- I have been to the restaurant multiple times. And I love it. One of the owners is also the uncle of Kassi's boss at the group home where she works. Just wanted to get that out of the way, use that information at your will.
I am really disappointed by how this case is being handled. Just a big old wake up call that classism is alive and well (or racism or xenophobia, if you want to go there). It has been way too long and charges need to be filed. Senser's wife is getting the white glove treatment- her lawyer tells the cops she drove the car, she hasn't been interviewed by police yet, and she gets to live her life as if nothing happened, driver's license and all.
And the media? Yeah, every few days when something comes out it's reported. But it's pretty bare bones. Whatever happened to investigative reporting? Is it just me, or does it seem fishy how slow and drawn out this process has been so far? Ask yourself this: if the tables had been turned, and this Laotian immigrant (who isn't rich, and has had run ins with the law in his past) ran over the affluent white wife of a local celebrity- would we see it played out the same? If you answer yes...well, ignorance is bliss. I consider myself somewhat of an optimist- but also a realist. Money talks in this situation- and in this case, I hope the jury lets that money talk all the way to the bank for the slain man's family. Who hits a man within blocks of a hospital and leaves him to die? Words can't describe how low I think of Mrs. Senser right now.
So for those not from Minneapolis or who don't know the story- the lead chef at True Thai (an award winning, and IMO the best Thai in Minneapolis) was the victim of a hit and run accident. It was awful- he was either dragged by the vehicle or hit hard enough to be thrown 40 feet before being left to die and where he was hit was mere blocks away from a hospital and emergency room.
To be fair, I will point out that I do have some bias (but who doesn't?)- I have been to the restaurant multiple times. And I love it. One of the owners is also the uncle of Kassi's boss at the group home where she works. Just wanted to get that out of the way, use that information at your will.
I am really disappointed by how this case is being handled. Just a big old wake up call that classism is alive and well (or racism or xenophobia, if you want to go there). It has been way too long and charges need to be filed. Senser's wife is getting the white glove treatment- her lawyer tells the cops she drove the car, she hasn't been interviewed by police yet, and she gets to live her life as if nothing happened, driver's license and all.
And the media? Yeah, every few days when something comes out it's reported. But it's pretty bare bones. Whatever happened to investigative reporting? Is it just me, or does it seem fishy how slow and drawn out this process has been so far? Ask yourself this: if the tables had been turned, and this Laotian immigrant (who isn't rich, and has had run ins with the law in his past) ran over the affluent white wife of a local celebrity- would we see it played out the same? If you answer yes...well, ignorance is bliss. I consider myself somewhat of an optimist- but also a realist. Money talks in this situation- and in this case, I hope the jury lets that money talk all the way to the bank for the slain man's family. Who hits a man within blocks of a hospital and leaves him to die? Words can't describe how low I think of Mrs. Senser right now.
Wednesday, September 14, 2011
Regulate the Baby Makin' Business
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/09/13/making-laws-about-making-babies
Room For Debate is one of my favorite things. Some are good, others better. This one is quite long, but the jist is this- there does need to be more regulation in the fertility business. There are too many clinics doing hack jobs and almost illegal stuff that give the good clinics (like the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics- name drop for my mom!) a bad name.
Also, this made me remember a funny story involving my mom. If you don't know- my mom is the textbook definition of sassy. Even Kassi and I after a couple drinks still don't compare to my mom's sass. But she's hard not to love- she's pretty awesome. Anyway, back to the story. I was due to get a new phone a few years back and I was home for the holidays so she gave me a ride to the local AT&T joint. She hates cell phone companies. She kind of hates cell phones, but knows that she's on the losing end of that one, so she tolerates. So she goes in already annoyed. Then they started trying to give me the old song and dance of changing my plan for this and that for more money. I brushed them off pretty easily. But my mom decided while she was there she wanted to add a line for my dad and get him a phone. And she didn't want to pay anything for it. She told the kid (to paraphrase)- you already take all my money for these plans that I don't even use. You know I don't even use those minutes, right? I don't even turn the phone on. But my husband is almost half dead so I need a phone for emergencies. So you just go and do what you need to do on the computer to make it happen. I work at the hospital, you know. I can make sure you get the best doctors..."
So she thoroughly scared the kid into getting what she wanted. While we're waiting for him to get everything ready I whispered to my mom, "Mom- you work in in vitro. What are you going to do to help that kid? Make him a baby?"
So the moral of the story is- if you ever want something for free, take my mom. She's good at intimidating people. And she can make babies.
Room For Debate is one of my favorite things. Some are good, others better. This one is quite long, but the jist is this- there does need to be more regulation in the fertility business. There are too many clinics doing hack jobs and almost illegal stuff that give the good clinics (like the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics- name drop for my mom!) a bad name.
Also, this made me remember a funny story involving my mom. If you don't know- my mom is the textbook definition of sassy. Even Kassi and I after a couple drinks still don't compare to my mom's sass. But she's hard not to love- she's pretty awesome. Anyway, back to the story. I was due to get a new phone a few years back and I was home for the holidays so she gave me a ride to the local AT&T joint. She hates cell phone companies. She kind of hates cell phones, but knows that she's on the losing end of that one, so she tolerates. So she goes in already annoyed. Then they started trying to give me the old song and dance of changing my plan for this and that for more money. I brushed them off pretty easily. But my mom decided while she was there she wanted to add a line for my dad and get him a phone. And she didn't want to pay anything for it. She told the kid (to paraphrase)- you already take all my money for these plans that I don't even use. You know I don't even use those minutes, right? I don't even turn the phone on. But my husband is almost half dead so I need a phone for emergencies. So you just go and do what you need to do on the computer to make it happen. I work at the hospital, you know. I can make sure you get the best doctors..."
So she thoroughly scared the kid into getting what she wanted. While we're waiting for him to get everything ready I whispered to my mom, "Mom- you work in in vitro. What are you going to do to help that kid? Make him a baby?"
So the moral of the story is- if you ever want something for free, take my mom. She's good at intimidating people. And she can make babies.
Tuesday, September 13, 2011
Michelle Bachman...you never cease to amaze me.
http://blogs.citypages.com/blotter/2011/09/hpv_vaccine_michele_bachmann_rick_perry_tea_party_debate.php
So there have been a plethora of articles about the GOP debate last night. I think I only saw one question. And it was answered by Huntsman, so in the grand scheme of the race, whatever he said didn't matter. But he pretty much said what every Tea Partier wants to hear- you pay too much in taxes from your paycheck. Well duh!
City Pages, always loving to take a crack at Bachmann any chance they can (and boy does she hand deliver the material!), focuses on her and cervical cancer. Rick Perry actually did something that made sense (well, to be fair, how he allows illegal immigrants to get financial aid is alright too). He did a govt mandate to have 11 and 12 year olds to get the HPV vaccinne to help prevent cervical cancer. Due to outcry (wait- loud people, no matter how stupid they sound/are, can win? Well, I never...) it was eventually retracted/overturned/whatever the hell the word is for a mandate not being mandated.
I know Michelle, as a mother of 3 girls, you hate when the govt invades your body. Giving them vaccines (which by the way is quite safe and the CDC has approved of it) like how we used to experiment on African Americans with syphillis in the South. But wait...you want the govt out of the "do this with/to your body" business? Well, what about abortion? Isn't the govt banning abortion telling people what to do with their bodies (yes, I am aware that this is a flimsy argument, but if you'd care to have the abortion debate- bring it)?
All in all, I think that was Michelle taking her last breaths. She's not going to get the nomination, so she's resorted to trying to grab the attention from the front runners. Oh wait, that's what she's been doing all along.
So there have been a plethora of articles about the GOP debate last night. I think I only saw one question. And it was answered by Huntsman, so in the grand scheme of the race, whatever he said didn't matter. But he pretty much said what every Tea Partier wants to hear- you pay too much in taxes from your paycheck. Well duh!
City Pages, always loving to take a crack at Bachmann any chance they can (and boy does she hand deliver the material!), focuses on her and cervical cancer. Rick Perry actually did something that made sense (well, to be fair, how he allows illegal immigrants to get financial aid is alright too). He did a govt mandate to have 11 and 12 year olds to get the HPV vaccinne to help prevent cervical cancer. Due to outcry (wait- loud people, no matter how stupid they sound/are, can win? Well, I never...) it was eventually retracted/overturned/whatever the hell the word is for a mandate not being mandated.
I know Michelle, as a mother of 3 girls, you hate when the govt invades your body. Giving them vaccines (which by the way is quite safe and the CDC has approved of it) like how we used to experiment on African Americans with syphillis in the South. But wait...you want the govt out of the "do this with/to your body" business? Well, what about abortion? Isn't the govt banning abortion telling people what to do with their bodies (yes, I am aware that this is a flimsy argument, but if you'd care to have the abortion debate- bring it)?
All in all, I think that was Michelle taking her last breaths. She's not going to get the nomination, so she's resorted to trying to grab the attention from the front runners. Oh wait, that's what she's been doing all along.
So much scientific research, so little time
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/13/health/13gene.html?ref=health&gwh=2E3337721F9EFFDBDB968BBD2DD31A60
This NY Times article talks about cutting edge cancer research. I think it's kind of funny that these doctors were so shocked and surprised about how successful their research/experiments were. Hopefully with continued funding, valid research such as this can continue.
This NY Times article talks about cutting edge cancer research. I think it's kind of funny that these doctors were so shocked and surprised about how successful their research/experiments were. Hopefully with continued funding, valid research such as this can continue.
Slow Clap for Anoka Hennepin District
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/13/us/13bully.html?hp&gwh=FC660BFCA3C26792B0C9AF48BE9141CB
They really deserve the slow clap- the kind that is so sarcastic and spiteful.
So for those of you not keeping up on your education news, the Anoka-Hennepin school district is the largest in the state. A good part of it is also in Michelle Bachmann land aka her district. They've had this lovely policy of neutrality towards any mention of homosexuality, etc. since 2009. How well has it worked? Hard to say. But they have had 8 student suicides in the last 2 years. And many were well known at having been bullied over sexuality choices or perceived sexuality choices.
In July 6 students brought a lawsuit against the district regarding the policy- that it created a hostile environment where bullying was dismissed or downplayed. Many teachers have come out saying they felt their hands were tied on how to deal with situations regarding this bullying over sexuality. The Department of Justice is also investigating the district regarding civil rights complaints.
I am really disgusted by this. The Minnesota Family Council, a Bachmann favorite, said this- "Saying that you should accept two moms as a normal family- that would be advocacy. There should be no tolerance of bullying, but these groups are using the issue to try to press a social agenda." Because you're not doing so by that statement...ok. I shouldn't get overly angry at work. Not a good idea.
It's only going to get worse in Minnesota with the voting regarding defining marriage in the constitution should happen in 2012. And why is this such a hard decision? It's not all about what parents want their kids to learn. It's about teaching children what should be learned- to be good people, to be accepting of their fellow students, to be upstanding citizens. If these parents have such a problem with this district changing the policy to that bullying can be stopped against LGBT students- then let them leave. Don't let them bully you just because they're the loudest in the room. It doesn't make them right. They can send their kids to other schools or home school them. If they're in the district, their taxes will still go to the district.
I am really disgusted by this right now. Well, ever since I found out about it. Really ever since my best friend was the first person to "come out" in high school and how she was treated.
Ok, the more I write about this, the more upset/frustrated/angry I get. I think I got my point across.
They really deserve the slow clap- the kind that is so sarcastic and spiteful.
So for those of you not keeping up on your education news, the Anoka-Hennepin school district is the largest in the state. A good part of it is also in Michelle Bachmann land aka her district. They've had this lovely policy of neutrality towards any mention of homosexuality, etc. since 2009. How well has it worked? Hard to say. But they have had 8 student suicides in the last 2 years. And many were well known at having been bullied over sexuality choices or perceived sexuality choices.
In July 6 students brought a lawsuit against the district regarding the policy- that it created a hostile environment where bullying was dismissed or downplayed. Many teachers have come out saying they felt their hands were tied on how to deal with situations regarding this bullying over sexuality. The Department of Justice is also investigating the district regarding civil rights complaints.
I am really disgusted by this. The Minnesota Family Council, a Bachmann favorite, said this- "Saying that you should accept two moms as a normal family- that would be advocacy. There should be no tolerance of bullying, but these groups are using the issue to try to press a social agenda." Because you're not doing so by that statement...ok. I shouldn't get overly angry at work. Not a good idea.
It's only going to get worse in Minnesota with the voting regarding defining marriage in the constitution should happen in 2012. And why is this such a hard decision? It's not all about what parents want their kids to learn. It's about teaching children what should be learned- to be good people, to be accepting of their fellow students, to be upstanding citizens. If these parents have such a problem with this district changing the policy to that bullying can be stopped against LGBT students- then let them leave. Don't let them bully you just because they're the loudest in the room. It doesn't make them right. They can send their kids to other schools or home school them. If they're in the district, their taxes will still go to the district.
I am really disgusted by this right now. Well, ever since I found out about it. Really ever since my best friend was the first person to "come out" in high school and how she was treated.
Ok, the more I write about this, the more upset/frustrated/angry I get. I think I got my point across.
Monday, September 12, 2011
This can't be true, right?
http://www.npr.org/2011/09/12/140336719/comcast-offers-a-digital-lifeline-to-the-disconnected?sc=fb&cc=fp
Comcast is offering high speed internet plans to low income families for $9.95 a month. And to help further alleviate the barrier, offering coupons for families to purchase computers for $150. I'll be the first to admit that I'm shocked. Comcast, doing something to help others? Never saw it coming. Families have to have a kid who qualifies for free/reduced lunch program (which would qualify maybe all but a handful of the kids I worked with at New Visions).
If this is true and not short term, bravo to Comcast. They're realizing that something like a barrier to Internet deeply affects many things. Education/achievement gap, technology literacy, etc.
Oh wait. "Comcast is not doing this solely out of the goodness of its corporate heart. The company promised to come up with just such a plan in exchange for government approval of its merger with NBCUniversal earlier this year.
And the bubble has been burst, and we're back to reality. Where corporations don't care about the common good/the people, they only do things in exchange for benefits for themselves. Oh Comcast, you almost had me fooled there...almost.
Comcast is offering high speed internet plans to low income families for $9.95 a month. And to help further alleviate the barrier, offering coupons for families to purchase computers for $150. I'll be the first to admit that I'm shocked. Comcast, doing something to help others? Never saw it coming. Families have to have a kid who qualifies for free/reduced lunch program (which would qualify maybe all but a handful of the kids I worked with at New Visions).
If this is true and not short term, bravo to Comcast. They're realizing that something like a barrier to Internet deeply affects many things. Education/achievement gap, technology literacy, etc.
Oh wait. "Comcast is not doing this solely out of the goodness of its corporate heart. The company promised to come up with just such a plan in exchange for government approval of its merger with NBCUniversal earlier this year.
And the bubble has been burst, and we're back to reality. Where corporations don't care about the common good/the people, they only do things in exchange for benefits for themselves. Oh Comcast, you almost had me fooled there...almost.
Wikipedia- they've got mostly everything.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/12/business/media/on-wikipedia-911-dissent-is-kept-on-the-fringe.html?ref=technology&gwh=A2E6220FC0D38A000CDC59EC519ED138
We all know Wikipedia- the good, the bad and the ugly. While I think it can be useful for looking up random things/facts/tidbits, I don't think it should be used as a main information resource. I think I'm in the minority. Case in point: Wikipedia doesn't always include everything, contrary to what people believe about it. The main article on Sept 11 does not include any information regarding theories believed by "truthers" (people who believe that the government caused 9/11, not necessarily the terrorists). I'm not saying I'm a "truther"- but if I'm reading what's supposed to be an encyclopedia article about the event, I'd like to know that there has been dispute/dissent about what happened. I mean, when you talk about the Kennedy assassination, you always mention all the conspiracy theories. Same with the moon landing. Why not this, Wikipedia?
We all know Wikipedia- the good, the bad and the ugly. While I think it can be useful for looking up random things/facts/tidbits, I don't think it should be used as a main information resource. I think I'm in the minority. Case in point: Wikipedia doesn't always include everything, contrary to what people believe about it. The main article on Sept 11 does not include any information regarding theories believed by "truthers" (people who believe that the government caused 9/11, not necessarily the terrorists). I'm not saying I'm a "truther"- but if I'm reading what's supposed to be an encyclopedia article about the event, I'd like to know that there has been dispute/dissent about what happened. I mean, when you talk about the Kennedy assassination, you always mention all the conspiracy theories. Same with the moon landing. Why not this, Wikipedia?
Album Review in a nutshell: Caroline Smith and the Goodnight Sleeps, Little Wind
So this is one of my favorite Minneapolis bands. Smith has an interesting warble that keeps me wanting to listen over and over. Their second album, Little Wind, drops Sept 20th (but super cool special people like me who donated to their Kickstarter got the digital download last week). They've kind of turned into this local super group of sorts (yes, that's a slight exaggeration). Drummer Arlen also drums for Cloud Cult and is also the nicest person you'll ever meet. Bassist/etc Jesse also plays with Lucy Michelle and the Velvet Lapels. So yeah, the talent is there.
I had high hopes for this album, so I was definitely afraid of being disappointed. But I wasn't. The first single, Tank Top, has been spinning on The Current for a while. Caroline's voice is kind of distorted, so I was glad that this wasn't used on all the songs. Songs that they've been playing a lot since releasing Backyard Tent Set were there- Birch Trees and Broken Barns, Denim Boy, etc. Hannah's Song features Nona from Dark Dark Dark on backup vocals, and it suits well, though it's quite soft and hard to tell unless you know Nona's voice.
The good-Eagle's Nest is so far my favorite song. That will change, of course, but for a song with so few lyrics, it's still moving. I like that a ukulele was used on Birch Trees and Broken Barns. The drums sound way better than they did on Backyard Tent Set. I felt like this time around they realized that Arlen is an amazing drummer and let him flex those muscles. He doesn't beat the drums like they owe him money, but there's something methodical about it. I can't quite put my finger on the right words to describe it just yet.
My only complaint (and it's not much of one) is that there were songs that had to be left off, specifically Rocking Chair and Maps.
I had high hopes for this album, so I was definitely afraid of being disappointed. But I wasn't. The first single, Tank Top, has been spinning on The Current for a while. Caroline's voice is kind of distorted, so I was glad that this wasn't used on all the songs. Songs that they've been playing a lot since releasing Backyard Tent Set were there- Birch Trees and Broken Barns, Denim Boy, etc. Hannah's Song features Nona from Dark Dark Dark on backup vocals, and it suits well, though it's quite soft and hard to tell unless you know Nona's voice.
The good-Eagle's Nest is so far my favorite song. That will change, of course, but for a song with so few lyrics, it's still moving. I like that a ukulele was used on Birch Trees and Broken Barns. The drums sound way better than they did on Backyard Tent Set. I felt like this time around they realized that Arlen is an amazing drummer and let him flex those muscles. He doesn't beat the drums like they owe him money, but there's something methodical about it. I can't quite put my finger on the right words to describe it just yet.
My only complaint (and it's not much of one) is that there were songs that had to be left off, specifically Rocking Chair and Maps.
Friday, September 9, 2011
Disconnect
Be back on Monday. While yes, there has been a lot of interesting news and tidbits I've come across yesterday and today already.
Had a family member lose their fight with cancer Wed night. Since it's something I work with and am surrounded by on a daily basis, it almost feels worse. I know more than ever how difficult, undiscerning and awful cancer is. So since I can't attend the funeral, I've just been throwing myself into work. Even though many days I don't realize the magnitude of what I and others do at the American Cancer Society- now more than ever I know that what I do, in a very small sense, helps people. And while it may sound silly, that's what makes me feel better in a horrible situation such as the one I'm in.
Hopefully I'll be back on Monday, ready to give you my unsolicited viewpoints :)
Had a family member lose their fight with cancer Wed night. Since it's something I work with and am surrounded by on a daily basis, it almost feels worse. I know more than ever how difficult, undiscerning and awful cancer is. So since I can't attend the funeral, I've just been throwing myself into work. Even though many days I don't realize the magnitude of what I and others do at the American Cancer Society- now more than ever I know that what I do, in a very small sense, helps people. And while it may sound silly, that's what makes me feel better in a horrible situation such as the one I'm in.
Hopefully I'll be back on Monday, ready to give you my unsolicited viewpoints :)
Wednesday, September 7, 2011
Gooooooo Libraries!
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/06/what-big-media-can-learn-from-the-new-york-public-library/240565/2/
Great article from The Atlantic about the greatness that is the New York Public Library. They're a great example of how libraries are keeping up with technology and using it to get people interested in libraries again (which isn't as hard, since during tough economic times, library usage has usually increased). And doing it while having their budget slashed to boot! I think most people I talk to who think libraries are useless and on their way out- they haven't taken the time to see what libraries are doing. And us Mpls folks are lucky, the Hennepin County library system is seen as one of the best in the country. Don't neglect it.
Great article from The Atlantic about the greatness that is the New York Public Library. They're a great example of how libraries are keeping up with technology and using it to get people interested in libraries again (which isn't as hard, since during tough economic times, library usage has usually increased). And doing it while having their budget slashed to boot! I think most people I talk to who think libraries are useless and on their way out- they haven't taken the time to see what libraries are doing. And us Mpls folks are lucky, the Hennepin County library system is seen as one of the best in the country. Don't neglect it.
GOP Debate
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/07/republican-debate-five-things-to-watch/?hp
Some points to watch for if you plan on watching the debate (I'll probably have it on in the background, but don't plan on watching that closely).
Though looking at the recent developments- I totally called it. I've said from the beginning that while Bachmann was someone to watch because of her money raising skills- her campaign is floundering and she won't last. And it's looking like that is going to come true. It's the Perry/Romney show, with Ron Paul there to pipe in every now and then with some interesting points to stir the pot.
Some points to watch for if you plan on watching the debate (I'll probably have it on in the background, but don't plan on watching that closely).
Though looking at the recent developments- I totally called it. I've said from the beginning that while Bachmann was someone to watch because of her money raising skills- her campaign is floundering and she won't last. And it's looking like that is going to come true. It's the Perry/Romney show, with Ron Paul there to pipe in every now and then with some interesting points to stir the pot.
Tuesday, September 6, 2011
Famine
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/06/world/africa/06somalia.html?ref=world
So I'm sure no one is surprised that there is famine in Somalia. Well, I hope no one is surprised. It breaks my heart- the images I see remind me of the last famine in the late '80's/early'90's and how affected I was by them as a child. What makes it worse this time is I feel moreso that the population is used as pawns. People are dying because militants practically forbade them to vaccinate their children, because it was Western poison. There have been reports of refugees being blocked from getting to camps.
I know I may be a little old to have a hero of sorts, but if I had to pick one (you know, outside the fam and all that jazz) it would be Dan Eldon. Photojournalist/artist genius. Worked as the youngest Reuters photog (at the time) and was in Mogadishu. Stoned to death out of ignorance- but his work is his legacy and damn, it's good. I highly suggest getting access to it, either through his website (kept up by his sister and mother) or through 2 books that were published after he died- one of his work and one a biography.
So I'm sure no one is surprised that there is famine in Somalia. Well, I hope no one is surprised. It breaks my heart- the images I see remind me of the last famine in the late '80's/early'90's and how affected I was by them as a child. What makes it worse this time is I feel moreso that the population is used as pawns. People are dying because militants practically forbade them to vaccinate their children, because it was Western poison. There have been reports of refugees being blocked from getting to camps.
I know I may be a little old to have a hero of sorts, but if I had to pick one (you know, outside the fam and all that jazz) it would be Dan Eldon. Photojournalist/artist genius. Worked as the youngest Reuters photog (at the time) and was in Mogadishu. Stoned to death out of ignorance- but his work is his legacy and damn, it's good. I highly suggest getting access to it, either through his website (kept up by his sister and mother) or through 2 books that were published after he died- one of his work and one a biography.
Sigh...higher ed woes.
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/09/05/rick-perrys-plan-10000-for-a-ba
You hear a plan like Rick Perry's and of course you're intrigued. But it's too simple- the complexities laid out in this Room For Debate show how while Perry is on the right track (because higher ed is *way* too expensive) he needs to dig deeper.
But he and everyone else is right- this bubble needs to burst, and if it keeps up, it will. It will reach a point where people will start to forego a college education because of the insane costs. And then what will they do?
The one question that kept popping up in my mind while reading this (and while I understand why it wasn't addressed- it's its own topic in itself) was what do we do for the college educated students who have graduated in the 21st century? We've got the debt and few job prospects. If we're going to reform the cost of education, we also need to reform the loans/financial aid/payback/forgiveness. Because no matter how much you lower the cost, it will always be a financial burden to some. So we need to also have something in place so that they're not swamped in debt come 6 months after graduation, jobless but with a fancy piece of paper.
And what about grad students? Or med students? You can't give them a $10,000 degree. But how can we make it affordable post graduation?
These thoughts swirl the mind as I realize I'm less than a year from graduation. With my current bills (which are pretty much the basics of food, car/insurance/gas, rent, internet) plus the prospect of lots of student loan debt heaping down- I'd be struggling. Granted, there are many lifestyle cuts I could make, but even then- if I lived a bare bones, ramen lifestyle, I still wouldn't be able to make ends meet. So here's to hoping for a better paying job! Yay?
You hear a plan like Rick Perry's and of course you're intrigued. But it's too simple- the complexities laid out in this Room For Debate show how while Perry is on the right track (because higher ed is *way* too expensive) he needs to dig deeper.
But he and everyone else is right- this bubble needs to burst, and if it keeps up, it will. It will reach a point where people will start to forego a college education because of the insane costs. And then what will they do?
The one question that kept popping up in my mind while reading this (and while I understand why it wasn't addressed- it's its own topic in itself) was what do we do for the college educated students who have graduated in the 21st century? We've got the debt and few job prospects. If we're going to reform the cost of education, we also need to reform the loans/financial aid/payback/forgiveness. Because no matter how much you lower the cost, it will always be a financial burden to some. So we need to also have something in place so that they're not swamped in debt come 6 months after graduation, jobless but with a fancy piece of paper.
And what about grad students? Or med students? You can't give them a $10,000 degree. But how can we make it affordable post graduation?
These thoughts swirl the mind as I realize I'm less than a year from graduation. With my current bills (which are pretty much the basics of food, car/insurance/gas, rent, internet) plus the prospect of lots of student loan debt heaping down- I'd be struggling. Granted, there are many lifestyle cuts I could make, but even then- if I lived a bare bones, ramen lifestyle, I still wouldn't be able to make ends meet. So here's to hoping for a better paying job! Yay?
Friday, September 2, 2011
Zadroga Bill
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/02/health/research/02cancer.html?ref=health
I'm sure many of my fellow Daily Show watchers remember this past Dec a very well done episode. Jon Stewart brought on 9/11 first responders to pretty much blast the Senate (specifically the Republicans who were filibustering the bill) for not passing the Zadroga bill. After this aired, they did pass the bill. But it was crap. The list of covered conditions does not include cancer. I'm disgusted, to put it lightly. Why are we nitpicking over what has "overwhelming evidence" to be included in the coverage, yet we can easily pass a bill extending Bush era tax cuts to the wealthy? Gah, reading this article just brings up all the hurt and anger I felt when this happened in December. Here are the videos from The Daily Show. I watched them again today after reading the article, just to refresh my memory. And I teared up a little.
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-december-16-2010/9-11-first-responders-react-to-the-senate-filibuster?xrs=share_copy
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-december-16-2010/worst-responders?xrs=share_copy
Sorry you have to click the links...tried to post the videos but kept having problems and gave up. Huh, maybe I'm more like Obama than I thought...
I'm sure many of my fellow Daily Show watchers remember this past Dec a very well done episode. Jon Stewart brought on 9/11 first responders to pretty much blast the Senate (specifically the Republicans who were filibustering the bill) for not passing the Zadroga bill. After this aired, they did pass the bill. But it was crap. The list of covered conditions does not include cancer. I'm disgusted, to put it lightly. Why are we nitpicking over what has "overwhelming evidence" to be included in the coverage, yet we can easily pass a bill extending Bush era tax cuts to the wealthy? Gah, reading this article just brings up all the hurt and anger I felt when this happened in December. Here are the videos from The Daily Show. I watched them again today after reading the article, just to refresh my memory. And I teared up a little.
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-december-16-2010/9-11-first-responders-react-to-the-senate-filibuster?xrs=share_copy
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-december-16-2010/worst-responders?xrs=share_copy
Sorry you have to click the links...tried to post the videos but kept having problems and gave up. Huh, maybe I'm more like Obama than I thought...
Oh, Grow Up
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/02/opinion/oh-grow-up.html?_r=1&hp
This editorial is a good representation about my feelings towards Obama right now- please, just stand up for yourself. And the rest of us. You have every right to give a speech (and an important one to boot) when you want. You went through the proper channels, let Boehner know and as soon as he starts to throw a hissy fit and publicly defy you, you relent.
Anyone else thinking Boehner is looking like a naughty child and Obama a parent who keeps letting them get away with it?
This editorial is a good representation about my feelings towards Obama right now- please, just stand up for yourself. And the rest of us. You have every right to give a speech (and an important one to boot) when you want. You went through the proper channels, let Boehner know and as soon as he starts to throw a hissy fit and publicly defy you, you relent.
Anyone else thinking Boehner is looking like a naughty child and Obama a parent who keeps letting them get away with it?
Thursday, September 1, 2011
Justice Department Toughens Stance on Abortion Protesters
http://www.npr.org/2011/09/01/140094051/obama-takes-tougher-stance-on-abortion-protesters
The Justice Department is starting to crack down on abortion clinic protesters. Good. This needs to be enforced more. Of course people who protest at abortion clinics think it infringes on their First Amendment rights. Except that the Justice Department isn't saying they can't protest. They're saying you can't physically stop someone from going in to the clinics. So don't do that and you'll be fine.
My only qualm with this article is that it talks about Planned Parenthood and sort of paints it as an abortion clinic. And it's not. It's so much more than that. As someone who has used and still uses the services of Planned Parenthood without ever having an abortion- if we want to change the perception of Planned Parenthood, we have to stop focusing on just the abortion aspect. The clinic I go to doesn't do abortions- probably why I've never encountered any protesters. Because ladies going to get their birth control is less controversial. If anything, those damn protesters should be there cheering me- by using PP services for birth control, I'm preventing me being put into a situation where abortion is a choice/option.
The Justice Department is starting to crack down on abortion clinic protesters. Good. This needs to be enforced more. Of course people who protest at abortion clinics think it infringes on their First Amendment rights. Except that the Justice Department isn't saying they can't protest. They're saying you can't physically stop someone from going in to the clinics. So don't do that and you'll be fine.
My only qualm with this article is that it talks about Planned Parenthood and sort of paints it as an abortion clinic. And it's not. It's so much more than that. As someone who has used and still uses the services of Planned Parenthood without ever having an abortion- if we want to change the perception of Planned Parenthood, we have to stop focusing on just the abortion aspect. The clinic I go to doesn't do abortions- probably why I've never encountered any protesters. Because ladies going to get their birth control is less controversial. If anything, those damn protesters should be there cheering me- by using PP services for birth control, I'm preventing me being put into a situation where abortion is a choice/option.
Condi vs. Cheney
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2011/09/01/140109228/condoleezza-rice-resents-cheneys-attack-on-my-integrity
So Dick Cheney has a memoir coming out. And in classic Dick Cheney fashion, he doesn't mince words. Who's surprised? Well, not me. But apparently people he used to work with. Colin Powell and Condi Rice have both said he's taking cheap shots. It's a memoir- by one of the most hated people in the US- did you expect it to be anything less? Dick Cheney is almost cartoonish in his evil. Or maybe I've just been watching The Daily Show for too long. Either way the last line of the article is the best- "Cheney, says he tells things as he remembers them having happened."
So Dick Cheney has a memoir coming out. And in classic Dick Cheney fashion, he doesn't mince words. Who's surprised? Well, not me. But apparently people he used to work with. Colin Powell and Condi Rice have both said he's taking cheap shots. It's a memoir- by one of the most hated people in the US- did you expect it to be anything less? Dick Cheney is almost cartoonish in his evil. Or maybe I've just been watching The Daily Show for too long. Either way the last line of the article is the best- "Cheney, says he tells things as he remembers them having happened."
"Generation Limbo: Waiting it Out"
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/01/fashion/recent-college-graduates-wait-for-their-real-careers-to-begin.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&smid=fb-nytimes
While I'm not a recent college grad, I will soon be a recent grad school grad. And I have been deferring my loans while in grad school. If I didn't, I wouldn't be able to get by. Que sera, sera. This article is definitely a wake up call/reality check for me. Everyone loves to throw a pity party every now and then, and I'm no different. But at least I didn't waste almost $40,000 on a BA and end up waitressing. I have a job, it pays a decent wage and I can sort of skew it that it's relevant to what I'm getting my master's in. At least next summer when I have my MLIS I'll have a job. Not a dream job, not a job I want to stay in, but a job. A job that will give me some money while I search for that ever elusive library position. I'm sure there are a million and one factos as to why this is happening. The economy, the larger amount of people going to college (thereby sort of cheapening the degree), the ridiculous rising cost of tuition. But damn. Just be glad you're not finishing your BA right now.
While I'm not a recent college grad, I will soon be a recent grad school grad. And I have been deferring my loans while in grad school. If I didn't, I wouldn't be able to get by. Que sera, sera. This article is definitely a wake up call/reality check for me. Everyone loves to throw a pity party every now and then, and I'm no different. But at least I didn't waste almost $40,000 on a BA and end up waitressing. I have a job, it pays a decent wage and I can sort of skew it that it's relevant to what I'm getting my master's in. At least next summer when I have my MLIS I'll have a job. Not a dream job, not a job I want to stay in, but a job. A job that will give me some money while I search for that ever elusive library position. I'm sure there are a million and one factos as to why this is happening. The economy, the larger amount of people going to college (thereby sort of cheapening the degree), the ridiculous rising cost of tuition. But damn. Just be glad you're not finishing your BA right now.
Tuesday, August 30, 2011
"Your Friends Are Not Your Audience..."
http://www.npr.org/blogs/monkeysee/2011/08/30/140056318/your-friends-are-not-your-audience-a-disturbing-internet-lesson-in-perspective?sc=fb&cc=fp
Warning- there will probably be some feminist ranting. But if you read the article and watch the video- it's pretty disgusting and degrading.
Our information age has changed our internal filters. This kid telling this story knows he's being taped and (I'm guessing) is looking for flash in the pan fame- much like someone whose blog post goes viral or youtube video goes viral. But when is it too far? I'm sure he's told the story to his friends and since they thought it was funny, he assumed this tale of sexual assault would regale the world and bring him the good feelings short lived fame brings.
Honestly- I'm disgusted by the amount of people who *continue* to laugh throughout the whole story. And I'm disgusted that these improv guys are totally prodding him to continue. Sex stories and jokes can be hilarious, don't get me wrong. But one listen and this is obviously not funny.
She said no. Multiple times. When will the tired diatribe of "She said no, but didn't mean it..." be put to rest? Granted, we don't know the entire story, but the convenience of how he leaves out details only when it comes to what happened after her repeated rebuffs and having sex is suspect.
If it turns out that this woman did in fact have sex with consent, then all the more power to the both of them. A bad mistake with a chance encounter. But even if that is how it turns out (I've got my doubts)- it's a double standard. This guy tells the story and he's regaled by the audience and the comedians for his pursuit. He's a stud, doesn't take no for an answer and takes risks. If we tell this from the woman's point of view- obviously she's a slut. She gave out her number while drunk and had sex with a man she didn't know. She's easily malleable and used, since she was so convinced by someone she never knew to have sex. No matter how you look at it- he's got the power, her the shame.
I think we're going to encounter more instances like this- because people think that with the world at their fingertips- the world wants to hear what they have to say. Even if someone along the line told this guy that the story was borderline offensive (and that's putting it quite lightly)- I'm sure he thought, "Well, I think it's funny. So I bet other people do." Give him an open mic, a camera and away he goes.
So congrats, Second City cook. You violated a woman and got 15 minutes of fame. Was it worth it?
Warning- there will probably be some feminist ranting. But if you read the article and watch the video- it's pretty disgusting and degrading.
Our information age has changed our internal filters. This kid telling this story knows he's being taped and (I'm guessing) is looking for flash in the pan fame- much like someone whose blog post goes viral or youtube video goes viral. But when is it too far? I'm sure he's told the story to his friends and since they thought it was funny, he assumed this tale of sexual assault would regale the world and bring him the good feelings short lived fame brings.
Honestly- I'm disgusted by the amount of people who *continue* to laugh throughout the whole story. And I'm disgusted that these improv guys are totally prodding him to continue. Sex stories and jokes can be hilarious, don't get me wrong. But one listen and this is obviously not funny.
She said no. Multiple times. When will the tired diatribe of "She said no, but didn't mean it..." be put to rest? Granted, we don't know the entire story, but the convenience of how he leaves out details only when it comes to what happened after her repeated rebuffs and having sex is suspect.
If it turns out that this woman did in fact have sex with consent, then all the more power to the both of them. A bad mistake with a chance encounter. But even if that is how it turns out (I've got my doubts)- it's a double standard. This guy tells the story and he's regaled by the audience and the comedians for his pursuit. He's a stud, doesn't take no for an answer and takes risks. If we tell this from the woman's point of view- obviously she's a slut. She gave out her number while drunk and had sex with a man she didn't know. She's easily malleable and used, since she was so convinced by someone she never knew to have sex. No matter how you look at it- he's got the power, her the shame.
I think we're going to encounter more instances like this- because people think that with the world at their fingertips- the world wants to hear what they have to say. Even if someone along the line told this guy that the story was borderline offensive (and that's putting it quite lightly)- I'm sure he thought, "Well, I think it's funny. So I bet other people do." Give him an open mic, a camera and away he goes.
So congrats, Second City cook. You violated a woman and got 15 minutes of fame. Was it worth it?
T-Rex and I are best friends
I can sometimes be quite impatient- much like T-Rex. Stupid life cookie. Plus- I figure a good "your mom" joke always starts the day off better.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)